New name system for the datasets

[bruAristimunha]

Now that we are inputting datasets from different sources, I think we should call the datasets by their LastNameYEAR, like we do in Moabb. What do you think @arnodelorme ?

[arnodelorme]

I think safest is to use DOI or an abbreviation of the DOI. doi:10.18112/openneuro.ds002718.v1.1.0 identifier would be ds002718.v1.1.0 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10640762 (https://zenodo.org/records/10640762) identifier would be zenodo.10640762 https://osf.io/etdkz/overview would be etdkz (no DOI apparently) I would not create a new identifier (then you need lookup tables etc… which is confusing for users — plus requires maintenance etc...)

…

On Nov 13, 2025, at 04:39, Bru ***@***.***> wrote: bruAristimunha created an issue (sccn/EEGDash#198) Now that we are inputting datasets from different sources, I think we should call the datasets by their LastNameYEAR, like we do in Moabb. What do you think @arnodelorme ? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>