Skip to content

Conversation

@Joao-Dionisio
Copy link
Member

Based on #881, I think it's helpful to include the answer as a recipe.

It's a bit scuffed, I think one needs to capture the final state of the problem, as the event handler is not called when the solving stops.

I'm also unsure about the best way to separate things, I decided just to include the event handler in the recipe and the user would need to optimize the model themselves, as well as plot the solutions afterward. I'd be happy with better suggestions, though.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 35 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 53.99%. Comparing base (23e00b3) to head (53627d2).
Report is 81 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/pyscipopt/recipes/primal_dual_evolution.py 0.00% 35 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #916      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   52.29%   53.99%   +1.70%     
==========================================
  Files          20       21       +1     
  Lines        3991     4380     +389     
==========================================
+ Hits         2087     2365     +278     
- Misses       1904     2015     +111     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mmghannam
Copy link
Member

Based on #881, I think it's helpful to include the answer as a recipe.

It's a bit scuffed, I think one needs to capture the final state of the problem, as the event handler is not called when the solving stops.

you can capture the final state using the exitsol callback.

I'm also unsure about the best way to separate things, I decided just to include the event handler in the recipe and the user would need to optimize the model themselves, as well as plot the solutions afterward. I'd be happy with better suggestions, though.

I think in recipes is ok but without the plotting and with good documentation :)

and thanks a lot João!

@Joao-Dionisio
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the suggestions, Mo!

I ended up copying the gas transportation model for the plotting example because importing stuff with python from different folders is somewhat finicky. I could have added a couple of lines using sys, but I feel like it would potentially complicate things for inexperienced users.

Also Mo and @Opt-Mucca, what do you think of creating an issue asking users to give us some of their pyscipopt models so that we can expand on the utils?

@Opt-Mucca
Copy link
Collaborator

@Joao-Dionisio I strongly support asking users to contribute models! That would be super helpful for our testing.

For this MR: I like the recipe and the example's fine (even if it does have a lot of duplicate code). My issue is with the changes in the tests, and I'm a bit curios from the design POV.

@Opt-Mucca Opt-Mucca merged commit c7ecb2a into master Nov 15, 2024
16 checks passed
@Joao-Dionisio Joao-Dionisio deleted the plot-pd-evolution branch January 16, 2025 15:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants