Abstracted Common models #12
geoffgifford01
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
Hi Geoff, This an interesting point. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
Thank you very much for your kind words. Much appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
There are multiple opportunities to create commonality between ibsync and ibapi.
Is there an appetite to separate out the common models - like ContractDetails, Contract, Connection etc. into their own library/git.
This would make using both ibsync and ibapi together in the same app substantially cleaner.
For example, I have a use case where streaming into the ticker object is not quite suitable, and it would be great I could simply reach into ibapi for some of the streaming with common models.
(I realise I could use an interface for casting). This was just a thought...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions