Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I contacted Western Digital. Here's the dialog:
My follow-up:
Their 2nd response:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I contacted Western Digital. Here's the dialog:
My follow-up:
Their 2nd response:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have 12 Reolink cameras running at full resolution at ~30 frames per second and I'm adding more. I've been using the Western Digital Purple series hard drive and generally. See https://github.com/scottlamb/moonfire-nvr/wiki/Hardware-Recommendations#hard-drives
I have had some problem, but I suspect it is the USB hard drive array which is a here-tody-gone-tomorrow Amazon brand, but for the last several months it has behaved.
I'm looking at adding another Western Digital Purple and notice there are three options for memory cache. The size of the drive is affected by which amount of memory cache you select. For instance, the largest drive, 14TB, only comes with a 128 MB cache. If I specify 256 MB cache, then the 14TB drive is not available, the largest is 10TB, so there is a trade-off.
With the high number of cameras, I'm saving "main" plus "subs", I would imagine more cache is better in case there might be any delays in saving data to the drive; however, this is pure supposition and theory on my part. I therefore thought I would start a discussion on this topic since I cannot find it addressed elsewhere in this project's site.
I found a Reddit discussion, but didn't learn much from it.
Is there a way to monitor or review what the cache's status is? Given the amount of video feeds I am throwing at a single disk, it would be interesting to learn if the quantity of feeds, e.g. 24, causes a bottleneck warranting a larger cache.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions