Any thoughts on providing JsonObject
interop instead of (or with) IDictionary
?
#1308
Closed
scarletquasar
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments 13 replies
-
So what is m missing, needed? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
9 replies
-
New sample for engine configured for better STJ support has landed main: #1663 , as Jint doesn't know STJ type it needs to be taught about it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently, we have
ExpandObject
orIDictionary<T1, T2>
interop to native JavaScript object. Any thought about providing native interop to JsonObject too?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions