Skip to content

Adding Creative Commons License #323

@mattaereal

Description

@mattaereal

Type of request

  • Strategy (planning, high-level discussions, roadmap)
  • Tech (infrastructure, tooling, tech stack)
  • Other

Why are you raising this issue?

After a small public debate, we've decided what license fits frameworks.

I'm leaving here the two versions of how to mark our work. We'll mostly be using from now on:

Plaintext

Security Frameworks © 2023 by Security Alliance, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
<a href="https://frameworks.securityalliance.org">Security Frameworks</a> © 2023 by <a href="https://securityalliance.org">Security Alliance</a> is licensed under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">CC BY-SA 4.0</a><img src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/cc.svg" alt="" style="max-width: 1em;max-height:1em;margin-left: .2em;"><img src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/by.svg" alt="" style="max-width: 1em;max-height:1em;margin-left: .2em;"><img src="https://mirrors.creativecommons.org/presskit/icons/sa.svg" alt="" style="max-width: 1em;max-height:1em;margin-left: .2em;">

Why do you think it is important?

Required for this type of content.

Can you justify your argument or provide additional resources?

https://creativecommons.org/chooser/

Contribution intent

  • I can work on implementing this
  • I'm raising this for discussion/someone else to handle

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

content:updateThis issue or PR updates content or suggests to

Type

Projects

Status

No status

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions