Final cleanup for dlink_upnp_exec_noauth

Author: jvazquez-r7

modules/exploits/linux/http/dlink_upnp_exec_noauth.rb

@@ -18,18 +18,15 @@ class Metasploit3 < Msf::Exploit::Remote
 
 	def initialize(info = {})
 		super(update_info(info,
-			'Name'        => 'D-Link UPnP SOAP Command Execution',
+			'Name'        => 'D-Link Devices UPnP SOAP Command Execution',
 			'Description' => %q{
-					Different DLink Routers are vulnerable to OS Command injection in the UPnP
-				SOAP interface.
-				Not every device includes wget which we need for deploying our payload.
-				On such devices you could use the telnet target for starting a telnet server or the
-				cmd generic payload and try to start telnetd or execute other commands. Since it is
-				a blind OS command injection vulnerability, there is no output for the executed
-				command when using the cmd generic payload. A ping command against a controlled
-				system could be used for testing purposes. This module has been tested successfully
-				on DIR-300, DIR-600, DIR-645, DIR-845, DIR-865.
-				It looks like that there are some more D-Link devices affected.
+				Different DLink Routers are vulnerable to OS Command injection in the UPnP SOAP
+				interface. Since it is a blind OS command injection vulnerability, there is no
+				output for the executed command when using the CMD target. Additionally, two targets
+				are included, to start a telnetd service and finally a session over it, or deploy a
+				native mipsel payload. This module has been tested successfully on DIR-300, DIR-600,
+				DIR-645, DIR-845 and DIR-865. According to the vulnerability discoverer, there could
+				be more D-Link devices affected.
 			},
 			'Author'      =>
 				[
@@ -139,6 +136,7 @@ def exploit_telnet
 
 			if sock
 				print_good("#{rhost}:#{rport} - Backdoor service has been spawned, handling...")
+				add_socket(sock)
 			else
 				fail_with(Exploit::Failure::Unknown, "#{rhost}:#{rport} - Backdoor service has not been spawned!!!")
 			end