Skip to content

fix: improve yaml load for sinks.max_retry_count, sinks.active_backfill and http_endpoints.encrypted_headers #764

fix: improve yaml load for sinks.max_retry_count, sinks.active_backfill and http_endpoints.encrypted_headers

fix: improve yaml load for sinks.max_retry_count, sinks.active_backfill and http_endpoints.encrypted_headers #764

Triggered via pull request May 12, 2025 23:51
Status Failure
Total duration 7m 45s
Artifacts

pr-checks.yml

on: pull_request
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

4 errors and 21 warnings
signoff: test/sequin/slot_message_handler_test.exs#L39
test handle_messages/2 with multiple partitions fans out messages to the correct partitions (Sequin.SlotMessageHandlerTest)
signoff: test/sequin/table_reader_server_test.exs#L164
test TableReaderServer processes records in batches (Sequin.Runtime.TableReaderServerTest)
signoff: test/sequin_web/controllers/yaml_controller_test.exs#L113
test plan/2 successfully plans configuration with wider set of fields (SequinWeb.YamlControllerTest)
signoff
Process completed with exit code 2.
signoff
62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1 inside guards requires an explicit step, please write 62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1//1 or 62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1//-1 instead
signoff
62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1 inside guards requires an explicit step, please write 62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1//1 or 62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1//-1 instead
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
Restore cache failed: Dependencies file is not found in /home/runner/work/sequin/sequin. Supported file pattern: go.sum
signoff
62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1 inside guards requires an explicit step, please write 62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1//1 or 62..@dynamic_table_start + length - 1//-1 instead
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
first..last inside match is deprecated, you must always match on the step: first..last//var or first..last//_ if you want to ignore it
signoff
low..high inside guards requires an explicit step, please write low..high//1 or low..high//-1 instead