There are some problems with the package name:
(1) The package name is inconsistent with the artifiact/domain name.
(2) According to Java's naming convention, package name should be in lower case.
(3) I pretends to be 1 seems not to be a good idea...
I understand 101tec is not a valid package name in java. IMO, even l0ltec is better than I0Itec, and com.I0Itec is better than org.I0Itec. But if I were you, I would considering another domain name (not starting with number).
There are some problems with the package name:
(1) The package name is inconsistent with the artifiact/domain name.
(2) According to Java's naming convention, package name should be in lower case.
(3)
Ipretends to be1seems not to be a good idea...I understand
101tecis not a valid package name in java. IMO, evenl0ltecis better thanI0Itec, andcom.I0Itecis better thanorg.I0Itec. But if I were you, I would considering another domain name (not starting with number).