How about officially supporting Solid.js?

[Souvlaki42]

I was wandering how about adding support for Solid.js? Is the closest alternative to React that I can think of. I was trying to migrate my React app using Shadcn UI to Solid.js and the only real problem I faced is that the custom components I was previously using had some React specific features like HTMLAttributes and forwardRef. There is already an unofficial port for Solid I just need something more official if possible.

Edit: React 19 and Next 15, deprecated forwardRef which could make the transition easier but it would still be nice for an official port to exist. Also this is one of the reasons as of why we need a framework agnostic way to build libraries nowadays.

[unomaas]

Bumping this, cause it's something I would also love to see! 🥳

[Yanxi-Tao]

+1

[totorofly]

+1

[BenjaminLindberg]

Very good idea! I'd also love to see ShadCN for SolidJS.

[whoiscarlo]

+1 Couldn't agree more!

[paxee]

This would be awesome!

[md-owes]

Any update from the maintainers of this repo?

[claughinghouse]

There are alternatives out there but the component parity is lacking. Really hopeful for official support!

https://www.solid-ui.com
https://shadcn-solid.com

[iitsg]

Would love this as well!

[InfinitlyUndefined]

Reporting here for official SolidJS support. It'd be awesome and open lots of doors. While there are good alternatives they are still lacking.

[Ayothegod]

+1
This package is really needed

[Ycg709jj]

+1

[dinesh-hills]

Would love to! +1

[leookun]

The concept of solid.js coincides with shadcn-ui. A natural couple. looking forward to official support！

[agustfricke]

Would love this! +1

[DanteASC4]

+1

[dennypenta]

+42

[grimalschi]

Is this even legal? 😅

[Mohammed-Yasin-Mulla]

+1

[OmarShref]

+111111

[Souvlaki42]

It would be nice for Radix to be official ported to Solid, this would be make porting Shadcn to UI almost entirely automatic, due to how similar these libraries are, but in the meantime, all these unofficial shadcn solid ports should merge into one and use a framework-agnostic headless UI library like Ark UI.

[perry-autofi]

+1

[kurumeii]

• 1

[mtctx]

+1

[BioHazard786]

+1

[nferreira1]

+1

[mixlette]

@Souvlaki42 @shadcn can we lock this conversation which is basically an endless flow of +1? Thank you.

[0-don]

no +1

[ARMC0DE]

+1

[dmit4git]

+1

[SpeedoPasanen]

+1 lol 👍
Clearly we need this.

[dennypenta]

The main problem is not in adopting shadcn, but porting headless part of radix UI. Looking at the experience of Kobalt UI maintainers it's not just adopting HTMLAttributes, there are lots more things.
If we manage to port Radix UI then support of Shadcn is not a question.
@Souvlaki42 Im happy to hear any ideas how to make it happen and what main challenges can be to port radix. At the moment I don't see it's viable.