Skip to content

Commit c57d685

Browse files
Use exact Ruby version 3.3.7 in Pro workflows
The Pro package Gemfile specifies exact version 'ruby 3.3.7', but using ruby-version: 3.3 in GitHub Actions installs the latest 3.3.x (3.3.9), causing a version mismatch error. Changed all Pro workflows to use exact version 3.3.7: - pro-lint.yml: 3.3 → 3.3.7 - pro-package-tests.yml: ['3.3'] → ['3.3.7'] - pro-integration-tests.yml: 3.3 → 3.3.7 (all jobs) This fixes: 'Your Ruby version is 3.3.9, but your Gemfile specified 3.3.7'
1 parent 9abd943 commit c57d685

File tree

3 files changed

+5
-5
lines changed

3 files changed

+5
-5
lines changed

.github/workflows/pro-integration-tests.yml

Lines changed: 3 additions & 3 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ jobs:
2222
- name: Setup Ruby
2323
uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
2424
with:
25-
ruby-version: 3.3
25+
ruby-version: 3.3.7
2626
bundler: 2.5.4
2727

2828
- name: Setup Node
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ jobs:
109109
- name: Setup Ruby
110110
uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
111111
with:
112-
ruby-version: 3.3
112+
ruby-version: 3.3.7
113113
bundler: 2.5.4
114114

115115
- name: Setup Node
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ jobs:
279279
- name: Setup Ruby
280280
uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
281281
with:
282-
ruby-version: 3.3
282+
ruby-version: 3.3.7
283283
bundler: 2.5.4
284284

285285
- name: Setup Node

.github/workflows/pro-lint.yml

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ jobs:
2121
- name: Setup Ruby
2222
uses: ruby/setup-ruby@v1
2323
with:
24-
ruby-version: 3.3
24+
ruby-version: 3.3.7
2525
bundler: 2.5.4
2626

2727
- name: Setup Node

.github/workflows/pro-package-tests.yml

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ jobs:
6565
rspec-package-specs:
6666
strategy:
6767
matrix:
68-
ruby-version: ['3.3']
68+
ruby-version: ['3.3.7']
6969
runs-on: ubuntu-22.04
7070
steps:
7171
- uses: actions/checkout@v4

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)