Strange thing I ran across - start_sync and start-sync both seem to start the app

[joetynan]

This one's kinda weird I think. I have accidentally been using 'start-sync' for kicking off a replication job, instead of start_sync. I didn't really notice until I was looking more deeply in the code, but 'start-sync' is not called out anywhere, and the function for it is rather explicitly called 'start_sync;. Does this leverage some sort of built-in operator in one of the ruby libs that might cull anything after 'start' or something perhaps?