SJIP: Clarify how to determine if the protocol role is trusted #27
WangSecurity
started this conversation in
Judging
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Description
This SJIP clarifies how to determine if the protocol role is trusted or not. Additionally, clarifies that admins are assumed to behave correctly and not harm the protocol/users.
Judging Guidelines PR
https://github.com/sherlock-protocol/sherlock-v2-docs/pull/57/files
Rationale
In one of the recent contests, Watsons claimed the specific role to be untrusted because it wasn't mentioned in the contest README, while the owner and admin roles were mentioned. Additionally, this change is to make the guideline easier for understanding of new Watsons coming to Sherlock, and makes the guideline easier to use for the Lead Judge to explain their decision.
Relevant Issue Discussions
Relevant discussion is on a private report.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions