You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
**NOTE: Now, the openstack-cloud-controller-manager implementation is based on OpenStack Octavia, Neutron-LBaaS has been deprecated in OpenStack since Queens release and no longer maintained in openstack-cloud-controller-manager. So make sure to use Octavia if upgrade to the latest openstack-cloud-controller-manager docker image.**
34
+
**NOTE: Now, the openstack-cloud-controller-manager implementation is based on OpenStack Octavia, Neutron-LBaaS has been removed in openstack-cloud-controller-manager since v1.26.0. So make sure to use Octavia if upgrade to the latest openstack-cloud-controller-manager docker image.**
35
35
36
36
## Deploy a Kubernetes cluster with openstack-cloud-controller-manager using kubeadm
37
37
@@ -85,7 +85,6 @@ Implementation of openstack-cloud-controller-manager relies on several OpenStack
@@ -181,7 +180,7 @@ The options in `Global` section are used for openstack-cloud-controller-manager
181
180
182
181
### Load Balancer
183
182
184
-
Although the openstack-cloud-controller-manager was initially implemented with Neutron-LBaaS support, Octavia is recommended now because Neutron-LBaaS has been deprecated since Queens OpenStack release cycle and no longer accepted new feature enhancements. As a result, lots of advanced features in openstack-cloud-controller-manager rely on Octavia, even the CI is running based on Octavia enabled OpenStack environment. Functionalities are not guaranteed if using Neutron-LBaaS.
183
+
Although the openstack-cloud-controller-manager was initially implemented with Neutron-LBaaS support, Octavia is mandatory now because Neutron-LBaaS has been deprecated since Queens OpenStack release cycle and no longer accepted new feature enhancements. As a result, since v1.26.0 the Neutron-LBaaS is not supported in openstack-cloud-controller-manager and removed from code repo.
185
184
186
185
* `enabled`
187
186
Whether or not to enable the LoadBalancer type of Services integration at all.
0 commit comments