tinycolor and Shai-Hulud
#1460
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
This was already resolved that evening yes - #1455 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hey there! Sorry you were affected by this. We were made aware of the attack within about three hours of it appearing and, despite most of us having signed off for the evening, we managed to pin tinycolor to the last known safe version and publish a new version of Web Awesome to prevent it from propagating to our users. We also posted on X, Bluesky, Threads, and Discord to warn folks. For those who aren't in the Discord chat, here's a copy of the post:
Soon after, we published 3.0.0-beta.6 and, fortunately, the affected versions were removed from npm the same evening. We take security very seriously and will continue to monitor our dependencies closely. If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out through any of our channels. Stay safe out there! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Just posting here to raise awareness. One of the package dependencies for webawesome is
tinycolor, that was one of the targeted packages in the Sept. 15 Shai-Hulud / Trufflehog npm attack.I, unfortunately, chose that very evening on the 15th to npm install webawesome to play around with a learning project. Fortunately, my orgs security folks detected the compromise quickly (and I don't possess any useful secrets - just a UX designer trying to upskill on frontend development.)
This article breaks down the attack, and gives some guidance on how to rebuild clean: https://www.wiz.io/blog/shai-hulud-npm-supply-chain-attack
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions