Is GitHub-Gitless-Sync and Fit(https://github.com/joshuakto/fit）any different?

[Inverstar]

I was confused and didn't know how to choose

[silvanocerza]

First time I hear about that project, seems pretty similar to this conceptually.
I took a quick look at the internals and it seems to work in a similar way to my project.

Up to you which one to chose. :)

[Inverstar]

Great! I find I can use both！

[dbarnett]

TIL about Fit too! Here's my comparison after trying both:

GGS advantages:

• Explicit conflict resolution
• More discoverable name
• Better auth token instructions (suggesting per-repo permissions vs "classic" tokens)
• Maintenance status not explicitly "paused" AFAICT

Fit advantages:

• Friendlier visual feedback
• Slightly friendlier setup
• Conflicts are simpler (just saves conflicts to alternate path, no explicit conflict resolution but that also makes conflicts less jarring and avoids misfeatures like [Feature request] Allow partial syncs if some files are conflicted #23)
• More user activity (30k installs, more GH forks)
• Cleaner issue tracker

What's the same:

• Similar implementations
• Both support mobile
• Both have cryptic sync failures in certain cases (Error: undefined setting 'sha' #21 & "File does not exist" failures after moving files #33 vs Unable to sync - if you are not connected to the internet, ... error joshuakto/fit#23)
• Neither mentions the other in their docs