You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One of the top goals of Baseprint Document Format is to minimize format rot risk (which all formats eventually suffer, just on different timescales).
One of the areas of format rot risk for BpDF is specifically how the contents in the <body> element of Baseprint XML might look in HTML in the distant future. The contents of the <body> element are currently always converted to HTML (and never to LaTeX, as JATS often is).
For future conversion to HTML, my judgement now is that there is less format rot risk using an established small subset of HTML rather than HTML-like JATS elements. Some of my reasons include:
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
One of the top goals of Baseprint Document Format is to minimize format rot risk (which all formats eventually suffer, just on different timescales).
One of the areas of format rot risk for BpDF is specifically how the contents in the
<body>element of Baseprint XML might look in HTML in the distant future. The contents of the<body>element are currently always converted to HTML (and never to LaTeX, as JATS often is).For future conversion to HTML, my judgement now is that there is less format rot risk using an established small subset of HTML rather than HTML-like JATS elements. Some of my reasons include:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions