DSGL proposal: drop criterion that init commit be signed #2
castedo
started this conversation in
Baseprint Feature D's
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Currently Hidos will error if the initial commit of a signed succession is not signed. And the DSGL spec 1.1 has this as a criterion for an ungarbled succession.
I propose that it is OK for the initial commit to be unsigned, even for a signed succession. It is still a hard criterion that all non-initial commits be signed with an allowed key.
But this really isn't necessary. It really only maters that non-initial commits are signed with whatever keys are listed in the init commit.
I originally made Hidos error figuring that it is a good way to make sure a user has their signing key setup properly. But on second thought I don't this is worth the extra complexity and artificial constraint.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions