Bug report: "start" and "end" don't seem to work together #11
Replies: 4 comments
-
Hmm, in fact...
...the above URL returns 10 records, with the last at
...while the above URL returns a thousand, with the last at I'm clearly doing something wrong, but I think I will admit defeat in my weekend coding. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Looking into this, the problem is on OP3's side - this will happen when using the special I don't think it has anything to do with Should be fixable, it will just result in reading more rows internally. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, just pushed a fix cff06de to production, give it another shot and see if that looks better on your side. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
That looks perfect, thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Using the above URL I get 10 results, with the last one timed at
"time": "2022-11-20T22:21:49.933Z"
The API promises that "Results are returned in ascending order by time", so it looks as if this podcast might have 11 or 12 downloads in total for this day.
Using the above URL I get 1,000 results, with the last one timed at
"time": "2022-11-20T09:07:19.705Z"
I am expecting all downloads from 2022-11-20T00:00:00.000Z until 2022-11-21T00:00:00.000Z to be returned in this call (up to the limit). This looks like a bug: and looks like I'm not supposed to be using
start
andend
in the same call. Perhaps this might kick up an error.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions