Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I guess 🤔 it's due to the vtable that is copied no matter what, even if storage{other.storage} fails to to the non-copiability of the contained type. Good catch. It's likely a bug, although pretty tricky. I'm taking note of it. 👍

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by pogmat
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
discussion it sounds interesting, let's discuss it
2 participants