OSDK Said Syntax At Line 1 Error But C Programming All Syntax Is Correct

[basicprogrammer30]

@kerravon86 I Tried To Parse C Program FIle To Tradional OS Assembly Language But Show Syntax Error:

firstperson@Acer-Aspire-4749Z:~/osdk/build$ ./bin/osdk simpleos.c
[OSDK] Compiling simpleos.c...
Error at line 1: syntax error
[ERROR] Compilation failed.
firstperson@Acer-Aspire-4749Z:~/osdk/build$ cat simpleos.c
void main() {
    // There Is Blank
}

firstperson@Acer-Aspire-4749Z:~/osdk/build$

And I want gcc like error catching system

I Think Problem Is Located In ./lang/cparser.y Line Around 250

Please Commit The Repo On compiler branch
GNU Flex Docs: https://ftp.gnu.org/old-gnu/Manuals/flex-2.5.4/flex.html

[kerravon86]

Sorry - I don't understand. I can see that you are trying to compile a C program. Presumably you want to generate x64 assembler output, correct? What is the reason you don't simply use gcc to do that?

[basicprogrammer30]

yes. but try compile using gcc and osdk

[kerravon86]

yes. but try compile using gcc and osdk

I'm not sure I understand. Are you trying to use gcc UNDER osdk? You showed what looks to be a Linux prompt. You're not using osdk. gcc under Linux normally works fine. Why aren't you simply using it? What are you doing that adds some value to that normal process?

[basicprogrammer30]

I Don't Use GCC Source Code Because I Can't Easily Implement Low Level Language Because It's Complex (More Stepper Learning Curve) (Time Consuming) And GCC Is Heavyweight.

[kerravon86]

I Don't Use GCC Source Code Because I Can't Easily Implement
Low Level Language

I don't know what you're calling a "low level language". I can see
from the source code you tried to compile what looks like C code.

GCC will totally compile C source code. So I don't understand
what you are trying to do.

Then you use the word "implement". What do you mean by this?
How do you "implement a language"? You mean you want to write
a brand new compiler for a brand new language? Or a brand new
compiler for C?

Because It's Complex (More Stepper Learning Curve)
(Time Consuming) And GCC Is Heavyweight.

You mean the GCC source code itself is complex? Why do you
care about that? Are you planning on modifying it? Is there
something wrong with it that would make you want to modify it?

It already produces x64 assembler code. I'm not sure what else
you would want from a theoretical replacement.