You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: vignettes/sampleSize_parallel_3A3E.Rmd
+85Lines changed: 85 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -23,7 +23,92 @@ doc.cache <- T #for cran; change to F
23
23
```
24
24
25
25
# Introduction
26
+
Similar to the example presented in [Bioequivalence Tests for Parallel Trial Designs: 2 Arms, 3 Endpoints](sampleSize_parallel_2A3E.html), where equivalence across multiple endpoints was assessed, we now extend the framework to trials involving two reference products. This scenario arises when regulators from different regions require comparisons with their locally sourced reference biosimilars.
26
27
28
+
In many studies, it is necessary to evaluate equivalence across multiple primary variables. For example, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommends demonstrating equivalence for both the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and the maximum concentration (Cmax) when assessing pharmacokinetic properties. However, in this case, we evaluate equivalence across three treatment arms, including a test biosimilar and two reference products, each sourced from a different regulatory region.
27
29
30
+
This vignette demonstrates advanced techniques for calculating sample size in such trials, where both multiple endpoints and multiple reference products are considered. As an illustrative example, we use data from the phase-1 trial [NCT01922336](https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01922336#study-overview), which assessed pharmacokinetics following a single dose of SB2, its EU-sourced reference product (EU_Remicade), and its US-sourced reference product (USA_Remicade) [@shin_randomized_2015].
31
+
32
+
```{r setup, echo=FALSE}
33
+
34
+
data <- data.frame("PK measure" = c("AUCinf ($\\mu$g*h/mL)","AUClast ($\\mu$g*h/mL)","Cmax ($\\mu$g/mL)"),
# Simultaneous Testing of Independent Co-Primary Endpoints
82
+
83
+
In this analysis, we adopt the **Ratio of Means (ROM)** approach to evaluate bioequivalence across independent co-primary endpoints.
84
+
85
+
86
+
## Different Hypotheses across endpoints
87
+
In this example, we aim to demonstrate:
88
+
89
+
* Bioequivalence of SB2 vs. EU-INF for AUCinf and Cmax, and
90
+
* Bioequivalence of SB2 vs. US-INF for AUClast and Cmax.
91
+
92
+
For all endpoints, bioequivalence is established if the 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the geometric means fall within the equivalence range of 80.00% to 125.00%.
93
+
94
+
Below is the R code to define the equivalence boundaries for each comparison:
0 commit comments