Package abandoned?

[db0]

See all all PRs still open and a lot of issues unaswered.

[TomLucidor]

Helpout here instead https://github.com/dimitrismistriotis/alt-profanity-check

[dimitrismistriotis]

Response to original comment in vzhou842/profanity-check#55:

Could you guys help out with the following as well? #57

Hi @TomLucidor and thanks for reaching out. We forked and started maintaining profanity-check while it was part of an offering on the company we were working at the time, then continued to update it as a service to the community plus as a learning stage for learning some tools.

 This repository/code base is out of our scope, if you or anyone else needs support on this, we are happy since we both have companies to consult on this either releasing our work to the public, or building features for specific cases in private. This can be done either directly or with a GitHub sponsorship. If this interests you, please reach out.

Either way, from a preliminary analysis, the project seems not to have any dependencies. This makes things easier than profanity-check.

[TomLucidor]

Do you think use case wise, alt-profanity-check is better than better_profanity? @dimitrismistriotis

[dimitrismistriotis]

@TomLucidor Different approaches as I read it briefly. Profanity which we cloned uses context hence the ML aspect, here it checks better permutations. Think this may be better for chat rooms for example, while profanity-check for messaging