Skip to content

Conversation

akwasniewski
Copy link
Contributor

@akwasniewski akwasniewski commented Aug 1, 2025

Description

Changing web implementation to use v3 types with a proper handlerData field.

Test plan

check whether handledData is a proper field of nativeEvent when using NativeDetector.

  const gesture = useGesture('PanGestureHandler', {
    onBegin: (e: any) => {
      console.log('onGestureHandlerEvent', e.nativeEvent.handlerData);
    },
  });

@akwasniewski akwasniewski marked this pull request as draft August 7, 2025 06:25
@akwasniewski akwasniewski force-pushed the @akwasniewski/v3-web-typing branch from 91aad1d to 5837159 Compare August 8, 2025 06:18
Base automatically changed from @akwasniewski/native-detector-web to next August 8, 2025 08:57
@akwasniewski akwasniewski marked this pull request as ready for review August 12, 2025 09:53
@akwasniewski akwasniewski requested a review from m-bert August 12, 2025 10:38
Comment on lines 113 to 116
type ResultEventType = GestureHandlerEvent<unknown> | GestureHandlerNativeEvent;
export interface ResultEvent<T extends ResultEventType = ResultEventType>
extends Record<string, T | number> {
nativeEvent: T;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but GestureHandlerEvent already has nativeEvent field (look here for context). In that case, we will have event type where it is possible to have nativeEvent.nativeEvent

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also I find it quite confusing with this default value, wouldn't it be easier to read if we had just ResultEvent<T> and then pass either GestureHandlerEvent, GestureHandlerNativeEvent or TouchEvent?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but GestureHandlerEvent already has nativeEvent

No, types in GestureHandlerEvent are wrappers on payload types defined here, and only add handlerData. Those types do not have nativeEvent field

Also I find it quite confusing with this default value

Ok, it was inspired by this. I thought that it would simplify the code as we would not have to write <unknown> everywhere. I don't have a strong preference, if you think it's better to add <unknown> i can change it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you think it's better to add i can change it.

What do you think I should do? I feel that current solution is stronger typed, what I think is better

@@ -369,7 +370,7 @@ export default abstract class GestureHandler implements IGestureHandler {
const { onGestureHandlerEvent, onGestureHandlerTouchEvent }: PropsRef =
this.propsRef!.current;

const touchEvent: ResultTouchEvent | undefined =
const touchEvent: ResultEvent<TouchEvent> | undefined =
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure that TouchEvent will have correct fields and won't expose something that we do not provide?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@akwasniewski akwasniewski Aug 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, gestureTouchEvent defined here, on which TouchEvent is a union has the same fields as the old nativeTouchEvent defined within web/interfaces.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@akwasniewski akwasniewski Aug 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now when I think about it we could probably do the same for GestureHandlerNativeEvent, is there a reason why v2 redeclared those types for the web, when we already have similar types in commons?
EDIT: ok, nevermind they have conflicting type

Copy link
Contributor

@m-bert m-bert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@akwasniewski akwasniewski merged commit 8b0f128 into next Aug 19, 2025
1 check passed
@akwasniewski akwasniewski deleted the @akwasniewski/v3-web-typing branch August 19, 2025 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants