1
1
Reservoir Model, 1
2
2
Reservoir Volume Option, 1
3
3
Reservoir Density, 2800
4
- #Reservoir Depth, 8500 feet, -- https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2024/Fercho.pdf
5
4
Reservoir Heat Capacity, 790
6
5
Reservoir Thermal Conductivity, 3.05
7
6
Reservoir Porosity, 0.0118
@@ -21,7 +20,6 @@ Well Separation, 365 feet
21
20
Injection Temperature, 60 degC
22
21
Injection Wellbore Temperature Gain, 3
23
22
Plant Outlet Pressure, 1000 psi
24
- #Production Wellhead Pressure, 325 psi
25
23
Ramey Production Wellbore Model, 1
26
24
Utilization Factor, .9
27
25
Water Loss Fraction, 0.05
@@ -32,11 +30,8 @@ End-Use Option, 1
32
30
33
31
Plant Lifetime, 25
34
32
35
- #Power Plant Type, 3
36
33
Circulation Pump Efficiency, 0.80
37
34
38
- #Exploration Capital Cost, 30
39
- #Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost, 234, -- 78 wells @ $3M/well
40
35
Economic Model, 3
41
36
Starting Electricity Sale Price, 0.15
42
37
Ending Electricity Sale Price, 1.00
@@ -62,7 +57,6 @@ Reservoir Depth, 5.4
62
57
Gradient 1, 36.7
63
58
Power Plant Type, 4
64
59
65
- # Well Drilling and Completion Capital Cost Adjustment Factor, 1.175
66
- Number of Injection Wells, 73
67
- Number of Production Wells, 73
60
+ Number of Injection Wells, 54
61
+ Number of Production Wells, 54
68
62
Production Flow Rate per Well, 80
0 commit comments