11Reservoir Model, 1
22Reservoir Volume Option, 1
33Reservoir Density, 2800
4- #Reservoir Depth, 8500 feet, -- https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2024/Fercho.pdf
54Reservoir Heat Capacity, 790
65Reservoir Thermal Conductivity, 3.05
76Reservoir Porosity, 0.0118
@@ -21,7 +20,6 @@ Well Separation, 365 feet
2120Injection Temperature, 60 degC
2221Injection Wellbore Temperature Gain, 3
2322Plant Outlet Pressure, 1000 psi
24- #Production Wellhead Pressure, 325 psi
2523Ramey Production Wellbore Model, 1
2624Utilization Factor, .9
2725Water Loss Fraction, 0.05
@@ -32,11 +30,8 @@ End-Use Option, 1
3230
3331Plant Lifetime, 25
3432
35- #Power Plant Type, 3
3633Circulation Pump Efficiency, 0.80
3734
38- #Exploration Capital Cost, 30
39- #Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost, 234, -- 78 wells @ $3M/well
4035Economic Model, 3
4136Starting Electricity Sale Price, 0.15
4237Ending Electricity Sale Price, 1.00
@@ -62,7 +57,6 @@ Reservoir Depth, 5.4
6257Gradient 1, 36.7
6358Power Plant Type, 4
6459
65- # Well Drilling and Completion Capital Cost Adjustment Factor, 1.175
66- Number of Injection Wells, 73
67- Number of Production Wells, 73
60+ Number of Injection Wells, 54
61+ Number of Production Wells, 54
6862Production Flow Rate per Well, 80
0 commit comments