You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: src/geophires_x_schema_generator/geophires-result.json
+2-2Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -472,12 +472,12 @@
472
472
"properties": {
473
473
"Wellfield maintenance costs": {
474
474
"type": "number",
475
-
"description": "O&M Wellfield cost",
475
+
"description": "O&M Wellfield cost. The built-in correlation for the wellfield O&M costs is similar as the surface plant O&M costs: it assumes that it consists of 1% of the total wellfield plus field gathering system costs (for annual non-labor costs) and 25% of the labor costs (the other 75% of the labor costs are assigned to the surface plant O&M costs).",
476
476
"units": "MUSD/yr"
477
477
},
478
478
"Power plant maintenance costs": {
479
479
"type": "number",
480
-
"description": "O&M Surface Plant costs",
480
+
"description": "O&M Surface Plant costs. GEOPHIRES estimates the annual surface plant O&M costs as the sum of 1.5% of the total plant capital cost (for annual non-labor costs), and 75% of the annual labor costs. The other 25% of the labor costs are assigned to the wellfield O&M cost. The labor costs are calculated internally in GEOPHIRES using the 2014 labor costs provided by Beckers (2016), indexed to 2017 using the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Employment Cost Index for utilities (2018). The original 2014 labor cost correlation expresses the labor costs as a function of the plant size (MW) using an approximate logarithmic curve fit to the built-in labor cost data in GETEM.",
0 commit comments