You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/Fervo_Project_Cape-4.md
+8-7Lines changed: 8 additions & 7 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -35,9 +35,10 @@ the [web interface](https://gtp.scientificwebservices.com/geophires/?geophires-e
35
35
| Well diameter | 9⅝ inches | Next standard size up from 7", implied by announcement of "increasing casing diameter" |
36
36
| Flow Rate per Production Well | 107 kg/s | Maximum flow rate achieved at Cape Station per https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240910997008/en/Fervo-Energys-Record-Breaking-Production-Results-Showcase-Rapid-Scale-Up-of-Enhanced-Geothermal. The announced increased casing diameter implies higher flow rates. |
37
37
| Number of doublets | 54 | Estimate based on extrapolation from [Project Red](https://gtp.scientificwebservices.com/geophires/?geophires-example-id=Fervo_Norbeck_Latimer_2023) and [Fervo_Project_Cape-3](https://gtp.scientificwebservices.com/geophires/?geophires-example-id=Fervo_Project_Cape-3)|
38
-
| Reservoir size & geometry | Reservoir Volume = 5,801,599,999 m³; Fracture Separation = 10 m | Extrapolation to based on a resulting heat extraction profile that is plausible and compatible with required electricity production. Actual number and size of fractures not known. |
38
+
| Fracture Separation | 18 m | Per https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/7665/, lateral length is 4700 ft = 1432 m. Dividing 1432 by 80 = ~18 m fracture spacing. |
39
+
| Reservoir Volume | 5,801,599,999 m³ | Extrapolation based on a resulting heat extraction profile that is plausible and compatible with required electricity production. |
39
40
| Water Loss Rate | 15% | Water loss rate estimated to be between 10 and 20% |
40
-
| Maximum Drawdown | 0.009 | Tuned to keep minimum net electricity generation ≥ 500 MWe and number of times redrilling = 1 |
41
+
| Maximum Drawdown | 0.009 | Tuned to keep minimum net electricity generation ≥ 500 MWe and thermal breakthrough requiring redrilling occurring every 5–10 years|
41
42
| Reservoir Impedance | 0.001 GPa.s/m³ | Same as 400 MWe case study (Fervo_Project_Cape-3) |
42
43
| Inflation Rate | 2.3% | US inflation rate as of April 2025 |
43
44
| PPA Price | Starting at 9.5 cents/kWh, escalating to 10 cents/kWh by project year 11 | Upper end of ranges given in https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2024/geothermal. Both PPAs 'firm for 10 years at less than $100/MWh' estimate given in a podcast. |
@@ -57,15 +58,15 @@ in source code for the full set of inputs.
57
58
58
59
| Metric | Result Value | Reference Value(s) | Reference Source |
| Project capital costs |~$4200/kW (based on maximum total electricity generation) | $4500/kW, $3000–$6000/kW |https://www.nature.com/articles/s44359-024-00019-9; Latimer, T. (2025, February 12). Catching up with enhanced geothermal (D. Roberts, Interviewer). https://www.volts.wtf/p/catching-up-with-enhanced-geothermal.|
62
-
| Maximum Total Electricity Generation |564 MW || Actual maximum total generation may be bounded or constrained by modular power plant design not modeled in this case study. For example, a modular design with 50MW units may constrain maximum total generation to 550 MW. |
63
+
| Maximum Total Electricity Generation |563 MW || Actual maximum total generation may be bounded or constrained by modular power plant design not modeled in this case study. For example, a modular design with 50MW units may constrain maximum total generation to 550 MW. |
63
64
| Minimum Net Electricity Generation | 505 MW | 500 MW |https://fervoenergy.com/fervo-energy-announces-31-mw-power-purchase-agreement-with-shell-energy/. The 500 MW PPA is interpreted to mean that Cape Station's net electricity generation must never fall below 500 MWe. |
64
-
| Average Production Temperature |200℃ | 204℃, 190.6–198.6℃ (optimal plant operating range) |https://jpt.spe.org/fervo-and-forge-report-breakthrough-test-results-signaling-more-progress-for-enhanced-geothermal; https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/7665/.|
65
+
| Average Production Temperature |199.1℃| 204℃, 190.6–198.6℃ (optimal plant operating range) |https://jpt.spe.org/fervo-and-forge-report-breakthrough-test-results-signaling-more-progress-for-enhanced-geothermal; https://eartharxiv.org/repository/view/7665/.|
65
66
| Well Drilling and Completion Cost Correlation | $3.96M/well | $<4M/well | Latimer, T. (2025, February 12). Catching up with enhanced geothermal (D. Roberts, Interviewer). https://www.volts.wtf/p/catching-up-with-enhanced-geothermal|
0 commit comments