You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/Fervo_Project_Cape-4.md.jinja
+5-4Lines changed: 5 additions & 4 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -93,15 +93,16 @@ in source code for the full set of inputs.
93
93
94
94
### Calibration with Fervo-implemented Field Design
95
95
96
-
Figure 18 of Singh et al. (2025) illustrates reservoir modeling that informed the Cape Station field implementation.
97
-
An equivalent GEOPHIRES simulation was run using the case study's reservoir engineering parameters, with the following modifications to match the Singh et al. (2025) scenario:
96
+
[Designing the Record-Breaking Enhanced Geothermal System at Project Cape](https://www.resfrac.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Singh-2025-Fervo-Project-Cape.pdf) (Singh et al., 2025)
97
+
describes reservoir modeling (ResFrac) that informed the Cape Station field implementation.
98
+
An equivalent GEOPHIRES simulation was run using the case study's reservoir engineering parameters, with the following modifications to match Singh et al.'s modeling scenario:
The following table compares the average production temperature profile from the "700 ft bench spacing" scenario in Singh et al. (2025) with the GEOPHIRES simulation.
102
+
The following table compares the average production temperature profile from the "700 ft bench spacing" scenario in Singh et al. with the GEOPHIRES simulation.
102
103
103
104
{# @formatter:off #}
104
-
| Reservoir Engineering Reference Base Case Simulation | Case Study Equivalent Simulation |
105
+
| Fervo-implemented Design Simulation (Fig. 18.) | Case Study Equivalent Simulation |
0 commit comments