You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Adjust stimulation cost to $4.6M/well (by removing 5% indirect cost) which aligns with drilling:stimulation cost ratio given in (Yusifov & Enriquez, 2025). Update case study documentation test accordingly including parsing of drilling & stimulation per-well and total costs.
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/Fervo_Project_Cape-4.md
+11-10Lines changed: 11 additions & 10 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Financial results are calculated
8
8
using
9
9
the [SAM Single Owner PPA Economic Model](https://softwareengineerprogrammer.github.io/GEOPHIRES/SAM-Economic-Models.html#sam-single-owner-ppa).
10
10
11
-
Key case study results include LCOE = $81.8/MWh and CAPEX = $5000/kW.
11
+
Key case study results include LCOE = $81.1/MWh and CAPEX = $5000/kW.
12
12
13
13
[Click here](https://gtp.scientificwebservices.com/geophires/?geophires-example-id=Fervo_Project_Cape-4) to
14
14
interactively explore the case study in the GEOPHIRES web interface.
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ in source code for the full set of inputs.
47
47
| Inflation Rate | 2.3% | US inflation rate as of April 2025 |
48
48
| PPA Price | Starting at 9.5 cents/kWh, escalating to 10 cents/kWh by project year 11 | Upper end of ranges given in 2024 NREL ATB (NREL, 2024). Both PPAs 'firm for 10 years at less than $100/MWh' estimate given in a podcast. |
49
49
| Well Drilling Cost Correlation & Adjustment Factor | Vertical large baseline correlation + adjustment factor = 0.8 to align with Fervo claimed drilling costs of <$4M/well | Akindipe & Witter, 2025; Latimer, 2025. |
50
-
| Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost per Well | $4.83M (all-in cost, including 15% contingency and 5% indirect costs)| The all-in cost is based on a ~$4.0M baseline stimulation cost, calibrated from per-stage costs of high-intensity U.S. shale wells (Baytex Energy, 2024; Quantum Proppant Technologies, 2020), which are the closest technological analogue for multi-stage EGS (Gradl, 2018). This baseline assumes standard sand proppant. The 15% contingency (~$0.6M) accounts for the necessary upgrade to ceramic proppant, which is required to resist mechanical crushing and geochemical degradation (diagenesis) over a 30-year well life at 200°C (Ko et al., 2023; Shiozawa & McClure, 2014). |
50
+
| Reservoir Stimulation Capital Cost per Well | $4.6M (all-in cost, including 15% contingency) | The all-in cost is based on a ~$4.0M baseline stimulation cost, calibrated from per-stage costs of high-intensity U.S. shale wells (Baytex Energy, 2024; Quantum Proppant Technologies, 2020), which are the closest technological analogue for multi-stage EGS (Gradl, 2018). This baseline assumes standard sand proppant. The 15% contingency (~$0.6M) accounts for the necessary upgrade to ceramic proppant, which is required to resist mechanical crushing and geochemical degradation (diagenesis) over a 30-year well life at 200°C (Ko et al., 2023; Shiozawa & McClure, 2014). |
51
51
| Capital Cost for Power Plant for Electricity Generation | $1900/kW | US DOE, 2021. |
52
52
| Discount Rate | 12% | Typical discount rates for high-risk projects may be 12–15% |
0 commit comments