-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 647
GH-2478 Handle conversion exception in AsyncRabbitTemplate #2932
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| import org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.listener.SimpleMessageListenerContainer; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| import org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.listener.adapter.MessageListenerAdapter; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| import org.springframework.amqp.rabbit.listener.adapter.ReplyingMessageListener; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| import org.springframework.amqp.support.converter.MessageConversionException; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| import org.springframework.amqp.support.converter.SimpleMessageConverter; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| import org.springframework.amqp.support.postprocessor.GUnzipPostProcessor; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| import org.springframework.amqp.support.postprocessor.GZipPostProcessor; | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
@@ -72,6 +73,7 @@ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| /** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * @author Gary Russell | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * @author Artem Bilan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * @author Ben Efrati | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| * @since 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| */ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
@@ -394,6 +396,29 @@ public void testStopCancelled() throws Exception { | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| assertThat(callback.result).isNull(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| @Test | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| @DirtiesContext | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| public void testConversionException() throws InterruptedException { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| this.asyncTemplate.getRabbitTemplate().setMessageConverter(new SimpleMessageConverter() { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| @Override | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| public Object fromMessage(Message message) throws MessageConversionException { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| throw new MessageConversionException("Failed to convert message"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| } | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| }); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| RabbitConverterFuture<String> replyFuture = this.asyncTemplate.convertSendAndReceive("conversionException"); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| final CountDownLatch cdl = new CountDownLatch(1); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| final AtomicReference<Object> resultRef = new AtomicReference<>(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| replyFuture.whenComplete((result, ex) -> { | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| resultRef.set(result); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| cdl.countDown(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| }); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| assertThat(cdl.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS)).isTrue(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| assertThat(replyFuture).isCompletedExceptionally(); | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| final CountDownLatch cdl = new CountDownLatch(1); | |
| final AtomicReference<Object> resultRef = new AtomicReference<>(); | |
| replyFuture.whenComplete((result, ex) -> { | |
| resultRef.set(result); | |
| cdl.countDown(); | |
| }); | |
| assertThat(cdl.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS)).isTrue(); | |
| assertThat(replyFuture).isCompletedExceptionally(); | |
| assertThat(replyFuture).failsWithin(Duration.ofSeconds(10)) | |
| .withThrowableThat() | |
| .withCauseInstanceOf(MessageConversionException.class); |
Something like this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good!
But does not look like it would be a good candidate to commit such a suggestion: too many broken indents.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Or never mind. I like it.
You have changed the logic, but at the same it is covered with that failsWithin() 😄
Committing and merging.
Thank you!
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But this line has to be removed then 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sure :)
Do you want me to align other tests to use failsWithin
void testReturn() {
...
assertThat(future)
.as("Expected exception")
.failsWithin(Duration.ofSeconds(10))
.withThrowableThat()
.withCauseInstanceOf(AmqpMessageReturnedException.class)
.extracting("routingKey")
.isEqualTo(this.requests.getName() + "x");
instead
try {
future.get(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
fail("Expected exception");
}
catch (ExecutionException e) {
assertThat(e.getCause()).isInstanceOf(AmqpMessageReturnedException.class);
assertThat(((AmqpMessageReturnedException) e.getCause()).getRoutingKey()).isEqualTo(this.requests.getName() + "x");
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would appreciate.
Thanks.
Those try..catch in tests is on my TODO list in favor of assertThat() when I touch these classes.
Although still would be with some code.
But now I have learned about failsWithin() which looks much cleaner. 😄
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.