Fix handling of null predicate in Specification.not() #3856
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
spring-projects#3849 When toPredicate() returns null, Specification.not() now returns builder.disjunction() instead of builder.not(null). This change ensures proper handling of null predicates in negated specifications. Signed-off-by: SWQXDBA <[email protected]>
spring-projects-issues
added
the
status: waiting-for-triage
mp911de
added
type: bug
mp911de
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
When toPredicate() returns null, Specification.not() now returns builder.disjunction() instead of builder.not(null). This change ensures proper handling of null predicates in negated specifications. Closes #3849 Original pull request: #3856 Signed-off-by: SWQXDBA <[email protected]>
mp911de
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
When toPredicate() returns null, Specification.not() now returns builder.disjunction() instead of builder.not(null). This change ensures proper handling of null predicates in negated specifications. Closes #3849 Original pull request: #3856 Signed-off-by: SWQXDBA <[email protected]>
mp911de
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
When toPredicate() returns null, Specification.not() now returns builder.disjunction() instead of builder.not(null). This change ensures proper handling of null predicates in negated specifications. Closes #3849 Original pull request: #3856 Signed-off-by: SWQXDBA <[email protected]>
mp911de
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 5, 2025
When toPredicate() returns null, Specification.not() now returns builder.disjunction() instead of builder.not(null). This change ensures proper handling of null predicates in negated specifications. Closes #3849 Original pull request: #3856 Signed-off-by: SWQXDBA <[email protected]>
|
Thank you for your contribution. That's merged, polished, and backported now. |
mp911de
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2025
When toPredicate() returns null, Specification.not() now returns builder.disjunction() instead of builder.not(null). This change ensures proper handling of null predicates in negated specifications. Closes #3849 Original pull request: #3856 Signed-off-by: SWQXDBA <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When toPredicate() returns null, Specification.not() now returns builder.disjunction() instead of builder.not(null). This change ensures proper handling of null predicates in negated specifications.
Closes #3849