-
I'm considering (still doing some testing but overall really pleased with the results so far) moving over my commercial product's documentation to mkdocs-material from the mkdocs RTD theme and am happy to sponsor. Unfortunately, one thing that holds me back is we've got build infrastructure that we try to keep as simple as possible and switching over to using a private repo for insiders would complicate things in an undesirable way. Is it possible to request re-ordering of a feature before sponsorship? I'd love to be the one who pushes over the limit to $6k for the next tranche of features, but the feature I'm most interested in is offline support which is not currently scheduled until $10k/mo which is another year and a half away. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Thanks for considering sponsoring! Unfortunately, reprioritization of features is not something to be considered. The tier structure is not arbitrary, a lot of thinking went into it. For this reason, offline support will stay within the $10k goal. However, setting up Insiders in CI is not hard. It boils down to creating a bot account with an access token: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks for considering sponsoring! Unfortunately, reprioritization of features is not something to be considered. The tier structure is not arbitrary, a lot of thinking went into it. For this reason, offline support will stay within the $10k goal.
However, setting up Insiders in CI is not hard. It boils down to creating a bot account with an access token:
https://squidfunk.github.io/mkdocs-material/publishing-your-site/#with-github-actions