Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
It followed the Material Design v1 spec closely, but not the newer specs (v2 and v3). This is also why it is not linked, because some users asked about it, and honestly, I find the newer specs to be worse iterations of v1. However, we say so in the README. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Should we add that to the doc?
…On Fri, May 5, 2023, 18:51 Martin Donath ***@***.***> wrote:
It followed the Material Design v1 spec closely, but not the newer specs
(v2 and v3).
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#5469 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABTCUXLJXZOZLL5WP332MPDXETSTZANCNFSM6AAAAAAXW4RRCM>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***
com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
It seems obvious, but I'm unable to find any info in the docs. Just to make sure, is it Material Design? If so, why not saying it anywhere?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions