Support available for managing versions for two separate sets of documentation? #5651
Unanswered
chipsenkbeil
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
I think you'd need to build two different documentation projects if you want to version them separately. Maybe talk to the authors of mike what's the best approach here, but separating those projects is likely the best and most scalable alternative. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Asking there to see if mike has any solution available: jimporter/mike#162. My next thought is to just do this manually by creating folders like discussed in #5568, but I wouldn't be able to take advantage of the versioning support that mkdocs material offers. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
My website is in the process of being built out with mkdocs material, and I have the need to support two different sets of documentation on the same website: a library/CLI and a neovim plugin.
These versions are distinct from each other, and I'd like to be able to reference a stable version of each and also support versioning of each.
For example, https://distant.dev/cli/0.20.x and https://distant.dev/neovim/0.3.x would be two separate projects housed under one mkdocs repository.
Is this something that's possible with the
mike
provider today? Or using a custom provider like mentioned in #5568?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions