Support alternative table formats in markdown #5677
chipsenkbeil
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Thanks for suggesting. Indeed, table formatting is not ideal. However, we consider anything that is related to Markdown processing as upstream. Material for MkDocs goes to great lengths to transform what we get from the Markdown parser and MkDocs into a website. Maybe this could be raised to Python Markdown, or there already is an alternative Markdown extension that implements better support for tables? If you make progress on improving table support, feel free to share it here! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
From what I can see, Mkdocs Material uses the standard pipe table format.
It'd be great to see other formats as configurable alternatives, or just support parsing multiple types of tables (like those discussed here).
The reasoning behind this is the limitations of pipe tables, namely the lack of multiline support, which means that some tables can get really long if a column needs a lot of text.
Pipe table
Grib table
Multiline table
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions