Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Hi @Zplusless,
thanks for pointing this out. However, this is not a regression - in old versions of the software, we only had a rough PRACH detector. Around the end of November, we improved the detector, fine-tuned the detection thresholds and introduced these warnings.

The problem is that the PRACH has hundreds of different configurations and it is impossible for us to ensure "perfect" performance for all of them. Specifically, the NR standard requires a 99% probability of detection and a 0.1% probability of false alarm. The warning you get is only saying that we don't reach such high requirements for the requested configuration, but, most of the times, you won't notice the difference - …

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@Zplusless
Comment options

Answer selected by pgawlowicz
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants