@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ another unit of money decreases the more money one has).
4141
4242This section outlines a very simple decision analysis for a commuter
4343deciding among modes of transportation to get to work: walk, bike
44- share, public transportion , or cab. Suppose the commuter has been
44+ share, public transportation , or cab. Suppose the commuter has been
4545taking various modes of transportation for the previous year and the
4646transportation conditions and costs have not changed during that
4747time. Over the year, such a commuter might accumulate two hundred
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ A decision consists of the choice of commute mode and the outcome is a
5454time and cost. More formally,
5555
5656* the set of decisions is $D = 1:4$, corresponding to the commute
57- types walking, bicycling, public transportion , and cab,
57+ types walking, bicycling, public transportation , and cab,
5858 respectively, and
5959
6060* the set of outcomes $X = \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R}_ +$ contains
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ posterior predictive distribution of utility.
193193
194194For simplicity in this initial formulation, all four commute options
195195have their costs estimated, even though cost is fixed for three of the
196- options. To deal with the fact that some costs ae fixed, the costs
196+ options. To deal with the fact that some costs are fixed, the costs
197197would have to be hardcoded or read in as data, ` nu ` and
198198` tau ` would be declared as univariate, and the RNG for cost would only
199199be employed when ` k == 4 ` .
0 commit comments