@@ -139,8 +139,8 @@ fit <- stan_glm(kid_score ~ mom_hs + mom_iq, data = kidiq)
139139# >
140140# > SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 1).
141141# > Chain 1:
142- # > Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 2.3e -05 seconds
143- # > Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.23 seconds.
142+ # > Chain 1: Gradient evaluation took 2.4e -05 seconds
143+ # > Chain 1: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.24 seconds.
144144# > Chain 1: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
145145# > Chain 1:
146146# > Chain 1:
@@ -164,8 +164,8 @@ fit <- stan_glm(kid_score ~ mom_hs + mom_iq, data = kidiq)
164164# >
165165# > SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 2).
166166# > Chain 2:
167- # > Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 9e-06 seconds
168- # > Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.09 seconds.
167+ # > Chain 2: Gradient evaluation took 1e-05 seconds
168+ # > Chain 2: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.1 seconds.
169169# > Chain 2: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
170170# > Chain 2:
171171# > Chain 2:
@@ -182,15 +182,15 @@ fit <- stan_glm(kid_score ~ mom_hs + mom_iq, data = kidiq)
182182# > Chain 2: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%] (Sampling)
183183# > Chain 2: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%] (Sampling)
184184# > Chain 2:
185- # > Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 0.03 seconds (Warm-up)
186- # > Chain 2: 0.058 seconds (Sampling)
187- # > Chain 2: 0.088 seconds (Total)
185+ # > Chain 2: Elapsed Time: 0.031 seconds (Warm-up)
186+ # > Chain 2: 0.059 seconds (Sampling)
187+ # > Chain 2: 0.09 seconds (Total)
188188# > Chain 2:
189189# >
190190# > SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 3).
191191# > Chain 3:
192- # > Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 8e-06 seconds
193- # > Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.08 seconds.
192+ # > Chain 3: Gradient evaluation took 1e-05 seconds
193+ # > Chain 3: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.1 seconds.
194194# > Chain 3: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
195195# > Chain 3:
196196# > Chain 3:
@@ -208,14 +208,14 @@ fit <- stan_glm(kid_score ~ mom_hs + mom_iq, data = kidiq)
208208# > Chain 3: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%] (Sampling)
209209# > Chain 3:
210210# > Chain 3: Elapsed Time: 0.033 seconds (Warm-up)
211- # > Chain 3: 0.058 seconds (Sampling)
212- # > Chain 3: 0.091 seconds (Total)
211+ # > Chain 3: 0.059 seconds (Sampling)
212+ # > Chain 3: 0.092 seconds (Total)
213213# > Chain 3:
214214# >
215215# > SAMPLING FOR MODEL 'continuous' NOW (CHAIN 4).
216216# > Chain 4:
217- # > Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 3.1e-05 seconds
218- # > Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.31 seconds.
217+ # > Chain 4: Gradient evaluation took 9e-06 seconds
218+ # > Chain 4: 1000 transitions using 10 leapfrog steps per transition would take 0.09 seconds.
219219# > Chain 4: Adjust your expectations accordingly!
220220# > Chain 4:
221221# > Chain 4:
@@ -232,9 +232,9 @@ fit <- stan_glm(kid_score ~ mom_hs + mom_iq, data = kidiq)
232232# > Chain 4: Iteration: 1800 / 2000 [ 90%] (Sampling)
233233# > Chain 4: Iteration: 2000 / 2000 [100%] (Sampling)
234234# > Chain 4:
235- # > Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 0.031 seconds (Warm-up)
236- # > Chain 4: 0.057 seconds (Sampling)
237- # > Chain 4: 0.088 seconds (Total)
235+ # > Chain 4: Elapsed Time: 0.032 seconds (Warm-up)
236+ # > Chain 4: 0.058 seconds (Sampling)
237+ # > Chain 4: 0.09 seconds (Total)
238238# > Chain 4:
239239ypred1 <- posterior_predict(fit )
240240ypred2 <- posterior_predict(fit )
0 commit comments