fix: use correct variable name

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

Author: kgryte

lib/node_modules/@stdlib/array/struct-factory/lib/main.js

@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ function factory( arg ) { // eslint-disable-line stdlib/jsdoc-require-throws-tag
 	} else if ( isStructConstructor( arg ) ) {
 		Struct = arg;
 	} else {
-		throw new TypeError( format( 'invalid argument. First argument must be either a struct constructor or struct schema. Value: `%s`.', Struct ) );
+		throw new TypeError( format( 'invalid argument. First argument must be either a struct constructor or struct schema. Value: `%s`.', arg ) );
 	}
 	BYTES_PER_ELEMENT = Struct.byteLength;
 	LAYOUT = Struct.layout; // TODO: consider whether to lazily materialize the struct layout, as this could potentially be a long string (hence increased memory consumption) depending on the complexity of the struct