Skip to content

Conversation

anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves None.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • adds STDLIB_MATH_BASE_NAPI_MODULE_III_D macro in math/base/napi/ternary

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

  • resolves None

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: missing_dependencies
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 23, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

stdlib-bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
math/base/napi/ternary $\color{green}155/155$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}5/5$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}155/155$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

anandkaranubc commented Jan 23, 2025

P.S. The refactoring looks great! My bad timing, haha, but at least I got to see both before and after.

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 23, 2025

The refactoring looks great!

Yeah, the previous organization (or lack thereof) was not going to scale.

@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 23, 2025

@anandkaranubc You're missing one necessary change. You also need to update the manifest.json file.

Copy link
Member

@kgryte kgryte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Apart from updating the manifest.json file, this PR LGTM.

@kgryte kgryte added Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. and removed Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Jan 23, 2025
@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

@anandkaranubc You're missing one necessary change. You also need to update the manifest.json file.

Doing it rn! Thanks for the catch :)

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---

---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
  - task: run_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_readme_examples
    status: na
  - task: run_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_cpp_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_fortran_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_julia_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_python_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_r_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: run_javascript_tests
    status: na
---
@kgryte
Copy link
Member

kgryte commented Jan 23, 2025

FYI: you can verify that everything works as expected by compiling the native add-on and running the unit tests. That would have caught the incorrect file name bug.

@kgryte kgryte changed the title feat: add STDLIB_MATH_BASE_NAPI_MODULE_III_D macro in math/base/napi/ternary feat: add III_D macro in math/base/napi/ternary Jan 23, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit 39c7a0a into stdlib-js:develop Jan 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@anandkaranubc anandkaranubc deleted the napi/ternary-iii-d branch January 23, 2025 01:00
Vinit-Pandit pushed a commit to Vinit-Pandit/stdlibMine that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2025
PR-URL: stdlib-js#4855
Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
ShabiShett07 pushed a commit to ShabiShett07/stdlib that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2025
PR-URL: stdlib-js#4855
Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Feature Issue or pull request for adding a new feature. Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants