feat: add array/base/to-inserted-at

[ShabiShett07]

---

type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

• task: lint_filenames status: passed
• task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
• task: lint_markdown status: na
• task: lint_package_json status: na
• task: lint_repl_help status: na
• task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
• task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
• task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
• task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
• task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_python status: na
• task: lint_r status: na
• task: lint_c_src status: na
• task: lint_c_examples status: na
• task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
• task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
• task: lint_shell status: na
• task: lint_typescript_declarations status: na
• task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
• task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

none

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• Adds the package array/base/to-inserted-at

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• none

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines.

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
array/base/to-inserted-at	$\color{green}372/372$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}34/34$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}5/5$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}372/372$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[ShabiShett07]

/stdlib update-copyright-years

[ShabiShett07]

@kgryte, this package can be useful for element insertion in arrays

[ShabiShett07]

@kgryte, I tried to fix everything, but I'm still not confident enough about naming conventions, Also, I tried to fix the benchmark by reassigning in every iteration. Also, I have changed the algorithm for more efficiency

[ShabiShett07]

@kgryte, I think now it is good

[kgryte]

@ShabiShett07 Are you wanting to make additional changes to this PR?

[kgryte]

/stdlib merge

[ShabiShett07]

@ShabiShett07 Are you wanting to make additional changes to this PR?

@kgryte, I am not sure because this was left behind because of a blocker as I remember

[kgryte]

/stdlib merge

[kgryte]

LGTM after clean-up.