-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 917
feat: add logic for eager evaluation in REPL #4277
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Coverage Report
The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR. |
---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
- task: lint_filenames
status: passed
- task: lint_editorconfig
status: passed
- task: lint_markdown
status: na
- task: lint_package_json
status: na
- task: lint_repl_help
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_src
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_cli
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_examples
status: na
- task: lint_javascript_tests
status: passed
- task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_python
status: na
- task: lint_r
status: na
- task: lint_c_src
status: na
- task: lint_c_examples
status: na
- task: lint_c_benchmarks
status: na
- task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
status: na
- task: lint_shell
status: na
- task: lint_typescript_declarations
status: na
- task: lint_typescript_tests
status: na
- task: lint_license_headers
status: passed
---
---
type: pre_push_report
description: Results of running various checks prior to pushing changes.
report:
- task: run_javascript_examples
status: na
- task: run_c_examples
status: na
- task: run_cpp_examples
status: na
- task: run_javascript_readme_examples
status: na
- task: run_c_benchmarks
status: na
- task: run_cpp_benchmarks
status: na
- task: run_fortran_benchmarks
status: na
- task: run_javascript_benchmarks
status: na
- task: run_julia_benchmarks
status: na
- task: run_python_benchmarks
status: na
- task: run_r_benchmarks
status: na
- task: run_javascript_tests
status: passed
---
1a0d75f to
e626b19
Compare
Signed-off-by: Vinit Pandit <[email protected]>
|
@kgryte Please take a look at the logic when you have time. If everything looks good, I can proceed with:
|
|
/stdlib rebase |
|
/stdlib update-copyright-years |
|
I request to have one look on the logic |
REPLREPL
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PS: I was NOT able to reproduce the behavior shown in the GIFs, hence couldn't test it out myself. Something needs fixing..
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Athan <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
REPL|
Thanks, @Vinit-Pandit and @Snehil-Shah! |
PR-URL: stdlib-js#4277 Ref: stdlib-js#2073 Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Snehil Shah <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Snehil Shah <[email protected]>
PR-URL: stdlib-js#4277 Ref: stdlib-js#2073 Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Snehil Shah <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Snehil Shah <[email protected]>
PR-URL: stdlib-js#4277 Ref: stdlib-js#2073 Co-authored-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Snehil Shah <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Athan Reines <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Snehil Shah <[email protected]>






Progress: #2073.
Description
This pull request:
REPLRelated Issues
This pull request:
Questions
No.
Other
No.
Checklist
@stdlib-js/reviewers