Skip to content

Conversation

KoolDrip
Copy link

@KoolDrip KoolDrip commented Oct 8, 2025


type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes. report:

  • task: lint_filenames status: passed
  • task: lint_editorconfig status: passed
  • task: lint_markdown status: na
  • task: lint_package_json status: na
  • task: lint_repl_help status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_src status: passed
  • task: lint_javascript_cli status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_examples status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_tests status: na
  • task: lint_javascript_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_python status: na
  • task: lint_r status: na
  • task: lint_c_src status: na
  • task: lint_c_examples status: na
  • task: lint_c_benchmarks status: na
  • task: lint_c_tests_fixtures status: na
  • task: lint_shell status: na
  • task: lint_typescript_declarations status: passed
  • task: lint_typescript_tests status: na
  • task: lint_license_headers status: passed ---

Resolves #8200

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request fixes several JavaScript lint errors which were detected in the automated workflow run, as described in issue #8200. Specifically, this pull request addresses:

  • no-new-array errors by refactoring array creation to use array literals and standard methods.
  • A jsdoc-doctest error by correcting the casing in a documentation comment.

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: passed
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Oct 8, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hi there! 👋

And thank you for opening your first pull request! We will review it shortly. 🏃 💨

Getting Started

Next Steps

  1. A project maintainer will approve GitHub Actions workflows for your PR.
  2. All CI checks must pass before your submission can be fully reviewed.
  3. You'll need to address any failures in linting or unit tests.

Running Tests Locally

You can use make to run any of the CI commands locally from the root directory of the stdlib repository:

# Run tests for all packages in the math namespace:
make test TESTS_FILTER=".*/@stdlib/math/.*"

# Run benchmarks for a specific package:
make benchmark BENCHMARKS_FILTER=".*/@stdlib/math/base/special/sin/.*"

If you haven't heard back from us within two weeks, please ping us by tagging the "reviewers" team in a comment on this PR.

If you have any further questions while waiting for a response, please join our Gitter channel to chat with project maintainers and other community members.

We appreciate your contribution!

Documentation Links

@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. label Oct 8, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
constants/float32/ninf $\color{green}75/75$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}0/0$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}75/75$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
random/sample $\color{green}843/843$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}120/120$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}8/8$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}843/843$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

First-time Contributor A pull request from a contributor who has never previously committed to the project repository. Good First PR A pull request resolving a Good First Issue. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Fix JavaScript lint errors

2 participants