You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Could you explain the main challenges you’ve faced with the current starting point selection for inverse regression in SU2, particularly when dealing with nonlinear fluid behaviors near phase transitions?
I'm interested in understanding the specific issues that lead to unreliable predictions, and how you envision a data-driven, physics-informed neural network approach might enhance both the robustness and efficiency of the method.
Additionally, could you share insights on potential strategies for automating the selection process while balancing computational cost with prediction accuracy?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Could you explain the main challenges you’ve faced with the current starting point selection for inverse regression in SU2, particularly when dealing with nonlinear fluid behaviors near phase transitions?
I'm interested in understanding the specific issues that lead to unreliable predictions, and how you envision a data-driven, physics-informed neural network approach might enhance both the robustness and efficiency of the method.
Additionally, could you share insights on potential strategies for automating the selection process while balancing computational cost with prediction accuracy?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions