11%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
22% %
33% SU2 configuration file %
4- % Case description: Actuator Disk example (not validated) %
4+ % Case description: Actuator Disk example %
55% Author: Francisco Palacios %
66% Institution: Stanford University %
77% Date: 2014.06.01 %
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ RESTART_SOL= NO
2626% ----------- COMPRESSIBLE AND INCOMPRESSIBLE FREE-STREAM DEFINITION ----------%
2727%
2828% Mach number (non-dimensional, based on the free-stream values)
29- MACH_NUMBER = 0.1
29+ MACH_NUMBER = 0.5
3030%
3131% Angle of attack (degrees)
3232AoA = 0.0
@@ -55,11 +55,26 @@ REF_AREA= 1.0
5555% Actuator disk boundary marker(s) (NONE = no marker)
5656% Format: ( inlet face marker, outlet face marker,
5757% rotation_angle_x-axis, rotation_angle_y-axis, rotation_angle_z-axis,
58- % root radius, tip radius, thrust coefficient, rev/min, ... )
59- MARKER_ACTDISK = ( disk_in, disk_out, 0.1104127, 9.743505, 14.09530, 0.30, 1.96, 0.3, 40 )
58+ % root radius, tip radius, pressure jump, temperature jump, rev/min,
59+ % uniform(0)/linear(1) distribution, ... )
60+ MARKER_ACTDISK = ( disk_in, disk_out, 0.1104127, 9.743505, 14.09530, 0.0, 1.96, 1000, 10, 0.0, 0 )
6061%
6162% Marker of the far field (0 = no marker)
62- MARKER_FAR = ( inlet, outlet, side )
63+ % MARKER_FAR = ( inlet, outlet, side )
64+ %
65+ % Inlet boundary type (TOTAL_CONDITIONS, MASS_FLOW)
66+ INLET_TYPE = TOTAL_CONDITIONS
67+ %
68+ % Inlet boundary marker(s) with the following formats (NONE = no marker)
69+ % Total Conditions: (inlet marker, total temp, total pressure, flow_direction_x,
70+ % flow_direction_y, flow_direction_z, ... ) where flow_direction is
71+ % a unit vector.
72+ MARKER_INLET = ( inlet, 288.15, 120193, 1.0, 0.0, 0.0 )
73+ %
74+ %
75+ % Outlet boundary marker(s) (NONE = no marker)
76+ % Format: ( outlet marker, back pressure (static), ... )
77+ MARKER_OUTLET = ( side, 101325.0, outlet, 101325.0 )
6378%
6479% Marker of the surface which is going to be plotted or designed
6580MARKER_PLOTTING = ( disk_in )
@@ -69,10 +84,10 @@ MARKER_MONITORING= ( disk_in )
6984
7085% ------------- COMMON PARAMETERS TO DEFINE THE NUMERICAL METHOD --------------%
7186% Numerical method for spatial gradients (GREEN_GAUSS, WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES)
72- NUM_METHOD_GRAD = WEIGHTED_LEAST_SQUARES
87+ NUM_METHOD_GRAD = GREEN_GAUSS
7388%
7489% Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy condition of the finest grid
75- CFL_NUMBER = 5 .0
90+ CFL_NUMBER = 10 .0
7691%
7792% Adaptive CFL number (NO, YES)
7893CFL_ADAPT = NO
@@ -94,17 +109,17 @@ LINEAR_SOLVER= FGMRES
94109LINEAR_SOLVER_ERROR = 1E-6
95110%
96111% Max number of iterations of the linear solver for the implicit formulation
97- LINEAR_SOLVER_ITER = 2
112+ LINEAR_SOLVER_ITER = 100
98113
99114% -------------------------- MULTIGRID PARAMETERS -----------------------------%
100115% Multi-Grid Levels (0 = no multi-grid)
101- MGLEVEL = 2
116+ MGLEVEL = 3
102117%
103118% Multi-grid cycle (V_CYCLE, W_CYCLE, FULLMG_CYCLE)
104119MGCYCLE = V_CYCLE
105120%
106121% Multi-Grid PreSmoothing Level
107- MG_PRE_SMOOTH = ( 1, 2, 3, 3 )
122+ MG_PRE_SMOOTH = ( 1, 2, 2, 2 )
108123%
109124% Multi-Grid PostSmoothing Level
110125MG_POST_SMOOTH = ( 0, 0, 0, 0 )
@@ -118,17 +133,43 @@ MG_DAMP_RESTRICTION= 0.75
118133% Damping factor for the correction prolongation
119134MG_DAMP_PROLONGATION = 0.75
120135
136+ % ----------------------- SLOPE LIMITER DEFINITION ----------------------------%
137+ %
138+ % Reference element length for computing the slope and sharp edges
139+ % limiters (0.1 m, 5.0 in by default)
140+ REF_ELEM_LENGTH = 0.1
141+ %
142+ % Coefficient for the limiter
143+ LIMITER_COEFF = 0.1
144+ %
145+ % Freeze the value of the limiter after a number of iterations
146+ LIMITER_ITER = 999999
147+ %
148+ % Coefficient for the sharp edges limiter
149+ SHARP_EDGES_COEFF = 3.0
150+ %
151+ % Reference coefficient (sensitivity) for detecting sharp edges.
152+ REF_SHARP_EDGES = 3.0
153+ %
154+ % Remove sharp edges from the sensitivity evaluation (NO, YES)
155+ SENS_REMOVE_SHARP = NO
156+
121157% --------------------- FLOW NUMERICAL METHOD DEFINITION ----------------------%
122158% Convective numerical method (JST, CUSP, LAX-FRIEDRICH, ROE-1ST_ORDER,
123159% ROE-2ND_ORDER)
124160CONV_NUM_METHOD_FLOW = ROE
125161%
162+ % Spatial numerical order integration (1ST_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER, 2ND_ORDER_LIMITER)
163+ SPATIAL_ORDER_FLOW = 2ND_ORDER
126164%
127165% 1st, 2nd and 4th order artificial dissipation coefficients
128166AD_COEFF_FLOW = ( 0.15, 0.5, 0.02 )
129167%
130168% Time discretization (RUNGE-KUTTA_EXPLICIT, EULER_IMPLICIT, EULER_EXPLICIT)
131169TIME_DISCRE_FLOW = EULER_IMPLICIT
170+ %
171+ % Relaxation coefficient
172+ RELAXATION_FACTOR_FLOW = 1.0
132173
133174% ----------------------- GEOMETRY EVALUATION PARAMETERS ----------------------%
134175%
@@ -147,7 +188,7 @@ NEW_ELEMS= 15
147188% GRAD_ADJOINT, GRAD_FLOW_ADJ, ROBUST,
148189% FULL_LINEAR, COMPUTABLE, COMPUTABLE_ROBUST,
149190% REMAINING, WAKE, HORIZONTAL_PLANE)
150- KIND_ADAPT = GRAD_FLOW
191+ KIND_ADAPT = FULL
151192%
152193% Scale factor for the dual volume
153194DUALVOL_POWER = 0.5
@@ -247,7 +288,7 @@ CAUCHY_FUNC_FLOW= DRAG
247288% ------------------------- INPUT/OUTPUT INFORMATION --------------------------%
248289%
249290% Mesh input file
250- MESH_FILENAME = ActuatorDisk .su2
291+ MESH_FILENAME = ActuatorDisk_I .su2
251292%
252293% Mesh input file format (SU2, CGNS, NETCDF_ASCII)
253294MESH_FORMAT = SU2
0 commit comments