|
| 1 | +## How Has This Been Tested? |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also note any relevant details for your test configuration. |
| 4 | +- [ ] Test A |
| 5 | +- [ ] Test B |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Checklist: |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code |
| 10 | +- [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the knowledge base (if needed) |
| 11 | +- [ ] My changes generate no new warnings |
| 12 | +- [ ] I have verified that the specification is met and all functionalities are working as expected |
| 13 | +- [ ] I resolved conflicts |
| 14 | +- [ ] Code is passing compilation |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Reviewer Score - 100% |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +- [x] **Meeting Task Specifications (50%)** |
| 19 | + - This includes both UI design and backend functionality. |
| 20 | + - Ensure that the task requirements are fully met and that the implementation aligns with the specifications provided. |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +- [x] **Attention to Edge Cases (10%)** |
| 23 | + - Identify and handle edge cases that may not be immediately obvious. |
| 24 | + - Demonstrate thorough testing and consideration of potential issues. |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- [x] **Writing Performant and Efficient Code (10%)** |
| 27 | + - Optimize the code for performance and efficiency. |
| 28 | + - Avoid unnecessary computations and strive for optimal resource usage. |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +- [x] **Addressing Feedback from Previous Code Reviews (10%)** |
| 31 | + - Act on feedback provided in previous code reviews. |
| 32 | + - Show improvement and a proactive approach to learning from past reviews. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +- [x] **Adherence to Coding Conventions (5%)** |
| 35 | + - Follow the established coding standards and guidelines. |
| 36 | + - Maintain consistency in style and structure throughout the codebase. |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +- [x] **Writing Readable Code (5%)** |
| 39 | + - Write code that is easy to read and understand. |
| 40 | + - Use clear and meaningful variable names, and include comments where necessary. |
| 41 | + |
| 42 | +- [x] **Considering Aspects Not Explicitly Mentioned in the Specification (5%)** |
| 43 | + - Demonstrate initiative by considering aspects that may not be explicitly mentioned in the task specification. |
| 44 | + - Enhance the implementation by thinking beyond the basic requirements. |
| 45 | + |
| 46 | +- [x] **Completing Pull Request Form (2.5%)** |
| 47 | + - Demonstrate initiative by considering aspects that may not be explicitly mentioned in the task specification. |
| 48 | + - Enhance the implementation by thinking beyond the basic requirements. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +- [x] **Up to 2 Cycles of Code Review (2.5%)** |
| 51 | + - Engage in up to two cycles of code review to refine and improve the code. |
| 52 | + - Incorporate suggestions and resolve any identified issues. |
0 commit comments