diff --git a/content/best-mfa-solutions-2025/index.md b/content/best-mfa-solutions-2025/index.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..03fa4dac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/content/best-mfa-solutions-2025/index.md
@@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
+---
+title: Best MFA Solutions Compared (2025 Guide)
+description: "Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide."
+date: "2025-12-10"
+cover: "TODO.png"
+category: "MFA, auth, guide"
+author: "Maurice Saldivar"
+---
+
+
+## Key Criteria for Evaluating MFA Solutions
+
+Choosing an MFA solution requires evaluating six core dimensions. Each carries different weight depending on your threat model, user population, and technical constraints.
+
+### Security Strength
+
+Phishing resistance separates modern MFA from legacy approaches. FIDO2/WebAuthn provides cryptographic origin binding that makes credential theft structurally impossible. Traditional TOTP codes remain vulnerable to realtime relay attacks where attackers intercept and replay codes within the 30-second validity window.
+
+Adaptive MFA evaluates risk signals before determining authentication requirements: geographic location, device fingerprint, time of access, behavioral patterns. A login from a recognized device in a familiar location might require only a password. The same user accessing sensitive data from an unknown network triggers additional factors.
+
+Risk-based policies define requirements based on resource sensitivity. Admin consoles demand hardware keys. Standard applications accept push notifications. Customer-facing apps balance security with conversion rates.
+
+### User Experience
+
+The most secure MFA is useless if users bypass it. Friction drives workarounds: shared credentials, disabled requirements, sticky notes with backup codes.
+
+Passkeys represent the current UX benchmark. Users authenticate with biometrics they already use to unlock their phones. No codes to transcribe, no apps to switch between. Adoption rates for passkey-enabled accounts consistently exceed traditional MFA methods.
+
+Fallback mechanisms determine what happens when primary authentication fails. Lost phones, dead batteries, forgotten hardware keys: these scenarios occur regularly at scale. Solutions need graceful degradation paths that maintain security while preventing lockouts.
+
+### Integration and Compatibility
+
+MFA connects to directory services (Active Directory, LDAP, cloud identity providers), cloud applications, and legacy systems that predate modern authentication standards.
+
+Directory integration determines how user provisioning flows. Native connectors to Azure AD, Okta, or Google Workspace simplify deployment. Custom LDAP configurations add complexity but serve organizations with established infrastructure.
+
+Legacy system support often becomes the deciding factor. MFA solutions handling edge cases through agents, proxies, or protocol translation provide broader coverage than those requiring application modifications.
+
+### Deployment Flexibility
+
+Deployment models range from fully managed SaaS to entirely on-premises installations.
+
+SaaS deployments offer fastest time-to-value with minimal infrastructure management. The trade-off: authentication traffic routes through vendor infrastructure, which may conflict with data sovereignty requirements or air-gapped environments.
+
+On-premises installations provide maximum control at the cost of operational overhead. Hybrid approaches split the difference: core authentication runs locally while management interfaces operate in the cloud.
+
+### Compliance and Reporting
+
+Regulated industries face specific authentication requirements. HIPAA mandates access controls for protected health information. PCI-DSS requires MFA for administrative access to cardholder data environments. SOC 2 audits examine authentication controls as part of security criteria.
+
+Audit logging capabilities determine how well you demonstrate compliance. Comprehensive logs capture authentication events, administrative changes, and policy modifications. Built-in reporting templates for common frameworks reduce audit preparation effort.
+
+### Cost and Scalability
+
+MFA pricing models vary significantly. Per-user licensing charges for each authenticated identity. Per-authenticator models charge for each registered device or method. Feature tiers bundle capabilities at different price points.
+
+Hidden costs accumulate beyond licensing: lost device replacement, user training, help desk overhead, administrative time for policy management.
+
+Scaling introduces its own challenges. Enterprise pricing often jumps at user count thresholds. What costs $3 per user at 1,000 users might cost $8 per user at 50,000 when advanced features become necessary.
+
+For detailed analysis of how MFA costs accumulate in real deployments, SuperTokens provides a comprehensive [MFA cost breakdown](https://supertokens.com/blog/multi-factor-auth-cost) examining licensing models, hidden expenses, and scaling considerations.
+
+
+## Top MFA Solutions in 2025 (Comparison)
+
+The MFA market spans developer-focused frameworks to enterprise identity platforms. Each solution optimizes for different priorities: flexibility, integration depth, legacy coverage, or compliance requirements.
+
+### SuperTokens
+
+SuperTokens provides an extensible authentication framework rather than a standalone MFA product. The open-source core handles session management, passwordless authentication, and MFA through composable recipes. Self-hosted deployments incur no per-user fees. The managed service starts free up to 5,000 MAUs, then scales at $0.02/MAU with MFA add-ons at $0.01/MAU.
+
+MFA capabilities include TOTP, email/SMS OTP, and integration points for WebAuthn. The recipe architecture lets you combine authentication methods without vendor-imposed limitations.
+
+The trade-off: implementation requires development effort. SuperTokens fits teams building products where authentication flexibility matters more than turnkey deployment.
+
+### Okta Adaptive MFA
+
+Okta dominates enterprise identity with risk-based policies that evaluate context signals dynamically: device posture, location, network reputation, behavioral patterns. The platform supports FIDO2, push notifications, TOTP, SMS, and hardware tokens through a single admin console.
+
+Developer SDKs and pre-built connectors cover thousands of SaaS applications. Policy configuration happens through UI without requiring code changes.
+
+Pricing scales with user count and feature tiers. Adaptive policies and advanced reporting require premium licensing. Capabilities demonstrated during sales often require additional modules at additional cost.
+
+### Microsoft Entra ID
+
+Microsoft Entra ID provides native MFA for organizations invested in Microsoft infrastructure. Conditional Access integrates authentication requirements with device compliance, application sensitivity, and user risk. Windows Hello enables passwordless authentication across Microsoft endpoints.
+
+The integration advantage is significant: Azure resources, Microsoft 365, and gallery applications work without additional configuration. Hybrid deployments bridge on-premises Active Directory with cloud identity.
+
+Outside Microsoft ecosystems, the value weakens. Non-Windows devices and third-party applications require more effort. Licensing bundles MFA with broader identity features, complicating cost comparisons.
+
+### Ping Identity
+
+Ping Identity specializes in hybrid identity where cloud and on-premises systems coexist. Federation support handles complex multi-organization authentication common in healthcare, financial services, and government.
+
+PingFederate manages authentication across diverse environments without requiring full cloud migration. The platform supports SAML, OAuth, OpenID Connect, and legacy protocols enterprise applications still depend on.
+
+Implementation complexity matches the problems it solves. Organizations with straightforward cloud-native architectures may find Ping's capabilities excessive for their needs.
+
+### Silverfort
+
+Silverfort extends MFA to systems that can't support modern authentication: legacy applications, file shares, command-line tools, service accounts. The technology intercepts authentication at the network level, applying policies to Kerberos, NTLM, and LDAP without code changes or agent deployments.
+
+This covers authentication gaps other solutions can't reach. Service account protection addresses a common audit finding.
+
+The trade-off: network-level integration adds infrastructure complexity. Organizations with modern application stacks may not need legacy coverage that justifies Silverfort's enterprise pricing.
+
+### RSA SecurID / Hardware Tokens
+
+RSA SecurID remains standard for high-assurance environments where regulations mandate hardware-based authentication. Decades of deployment history in financial services, government, and defense sectors establish trust that newer solutions lack.
+
+Hardware tokens work without smartphones, network connectivity, or software dependencies. FIPS 140-2 validation satisfies compliance requirements software-based solutions cannot meet.
+
+User experience and logistics present challenges: physical distribution, battery tracking, lost device procedures. The approach fits environments where compliance requirements outweigh convenience.
+
+### Comparison Table
+
+| Provider | Key Strengths | Trade-offs | Best Fit |
+|----------|---------------|------------|----------|
+| **SuperTokens** | Open-source, transparent pricing, self-host option, composable MFA recipes | Requires development integration | Developer teams building custom products |
+| **Okta** | Adaptive policies, extensive SaaS connectors, comprehensive feature set | Premium pricing, tier complexity | Enterprises consolidating identity platforms |
+| **Microsoft Entra ID** | Native Microsoft integration, Conditional Access, Windows Hello | Limited value outside Microsoft ecosystem | Microsoft-centric organizations |
+| **Ping Identity** | Hybrid identity, federation, legacy protocol support | Implementation complexity | Multi-environment enterprises with federation needs |
+| **Silverfort** | Agentless deployment, legacy system coverage, service account MFA | Network architecture requirements | Organizations with significant legacy infrastructure |
+| **RSA SecurID** | Hardware assurance, FIPS validation, regulatory acceptance | Physical logistics, UX friction | Regulated industries requiring hardware tokens |
+
+The right choice depends on your starting point. Microsoft shops benefit from Entra ID's native integration. Legacy-heavy environments need Silverfort's agentless coverage. Development teams building products find SuperTokens' flexibility valuable. Enterprises standardizing identity often land on Okta despite the cost premium.
+
+## MFA Cost Considerations: What Really Matters
+
+MFA pricing appears straightforward until you deploy at scale. The gap between quoted per-user rates and actual total cost often surprises organizations during budget reviews.
+
+### Licensing Models
+
+Vendors structure pricing differently, and the model you choose affects costs as your organization evolves.
+
+**Per-user licensing** charges for each identity that can authenticate. This works predictably for stable employee populations but creates friction for customer-facing applications where user counts fluctuate. Some vendors count monthly active users, others count provisioned accounts regardless of activity.
+
+**Per-device licensing** charges for each registered authenticator. An employee with a phone and a hardware backup key counts as two devices. BYOD environments where users register personal and work devices multiply costs quickly.
+
+**Per-authenticator licensing** charges based on authentication method. TOTP might be included in base pricing while push notifications or hardware token support require premium tiers. Organizations often discover that the authentication methods they actually need sit behind additional paywalls.
+
+**Feature tiers** bundle capabilities at escalating price points. Adaptive MFA, advanced reporting, and API access frequently require enterprise licensing. The gap between "Starter" and "Enterprise" tiers can be 3-5x per user.
+
+### Hidden Costs
+
+Licensing represents only part of MFA expenditure. Operational costs accumulate in less visible ways.
+
+**Lost device replacement** generates ongoing expense. Hardware tokens cost $25-50 each plus shipping. Smartphone loss triggers re-enrollment workflows that consume IT time. Organizations replacing 5-10% of authenticators annually should budget accordingly.
+
+**User training** requires investment upfront and ongoing. Initial rollout needs documentation, communication campaigns, and support staff preparation. New employee onboarding includes MFA enrollment. Changes to authentication methods require retraining.
+
+**Help desk overhead** increases with MFA deployment. Password reset tickets decrease, but authentication troubleshooting tickets increase. Lockout recovery, device registration issues, and user confusion create support burden. Some organizations report 15-20% of help desk volume relates to MFA after deployment.
+
+**Administrative time** for policy management, user provisioning, and audit preparation adds up. Enterprises with complex policies spend significant hours maintaining authentication configurations across user populations and applications.
+
+### Scaling Challenges
+
+MFA economics change at scale. Pricing that works for hundreds of users becomes problematic at tens of thousands.
+
+**Volume thresholds** trigger pricing tier changes. A solution costing $3/user at 1,000 users might jump to $6/user at 10,000 when you cross into enterprise pricing. Some vendors offer volume discounts; others increase per-user costs as feature requirements grow with organizational complexity.
+
+**Feature creep** drives cost escalation. Small deployments work fine with basic TOTP. Larger deployments need adaptive policies, SSO integration, and compliance reporting. Each capability addition increases licensing costs.
+
+**Multi-tenant complexity** affects organizations managing authentication for customers or partners. Separate policies, branding, and administration per tenant add overhead that single-tenant pricing doesn't anticipate.
+
+**Contract negotiations** become necessary at enterprise scale. Published pricing often serves as a starting point rather than final cost. Organizations with leverage can negotiate significantly better rates, but this requires procurement expertise and competitive alternatives.
+
+### Insights from SuperTokens
+
+SuperTokens' [MFA cost breakdown](https://supertokens.com/blog/multi-factor-auth-cost) examines how authentication expenses accumulate across deployment scenarios. Key findings:
+
+**Transparent pricing prevents surprises**: SuperTokens publishes rates without requiring sales conversations: free self-hosted, $0.02/MAU for managed service, $0.01/MAU for MFA add-ons with a $100/month minimum. This predictability enables accurate budgeting.
+
+**Self-hosting eliminates per-user costs entirely**: Organizations with infrastructure capacity can run SuperTokens Core without licensing fees. The trade-off shifts from licensing to operational overhead for hosting and maintenance.
+
+**Feature bundling affects total cost**: Enterprise MFA solutions bundle authentication with identity governance, access management, and compliance tools. Organizations needing only MFA pay for capabilities they don't use. SuperTokens' recipe architecture lets you add only the authentication features you need.
+
+**Cost comparison requires scenario modeling**: A solution cheaper at 1,000 users might cost more at 50,000. SuperTokens' analysis provides frameworks for projecting costs across growth scenarios rather than evaluating only current state.
+
+The cost calculation extends beyond monthly licensing. Factor in implementation effort, ongoing administration, support overhead, and scaling trajectory. The cheapest solution at current scale might be the most expensive choice over three years.
+
+## Emerging Trends in MFA (2025 and Beyond)
+
+Four trends are reshaping how organizations approach MFA implementation.
+
+### Passkeys and WebAuthn
+
+Passkeys combine passwordless authentication with phishing resistance. Built on WebAuthn, passkeys use public-key cryptography bound to specific origins. The private key never leaves the user's device. Attackers can't phish credentials that don't exist as shared secrets.
+
+Apple, Google, and Microsoft now support passkeys across their ecosystems. Cross-device synchronization through platform keystores addresses the recovery problem that plagued hardware-only approaches. GitHub, Shopify, and Kayak have deployed passkeys for customer authentication.
+
+The direction is clear: passwords are becoming optional, then deprecated. Organizations evaluating MFA should consider passkey support as a baseline requirement.
+
+### Adaptive Authentication
+
+Static policies apply the same requirements regardless of context. Adaptive authentication evaluates risk signals before determining what verification to require: device posture, geographic location, network reputation, behavioral patterns.
+
+A login from a managed device on the corporate network might require only a password. The same user accessing sensitive data from an unfamiliar location triggers step-up authentication. Machine learning models improve risk scoring over time, detecting anomalies that rule-based systems miss.
+
+The benefit: low-risk authentications require less friction while high-risk scenarios get appropriate scrutiny.
+
+### Zero Trust Architecture
+
+Zero trust treats every access request as potentially hostile regardless of network location. MFA becomes foundational rather than optional.
+
+Continuous authentication validates identity throughout sessions. Step-up authentication triggers for sensitive resources. Device posture assessment combines with user authentication for access decisions.
+
+Federal mandates are driving adoption. Executive Order 14028 requires zero trust architecture for US government agencies. Regulated industries and enterprises follow.
+
+### Offline and Edge MFA
+
+Not all authentication happens with reliable connectivity. Industrial facilities, remote locations, and air-gapped environments need MFA that works without cloud dependencies.
+
+Hardware tokens with time-based OTP provide offline authentication. FIDO2 security keys work offline for local authentication after initial registration. Edge architectures cache credentials locally while synchronizing when connectivity permits.
+
+These trends share a common thread: authentication is becoming more contextual and integrated into broader security architectures. Evaluate solutions against where authentication is heading, not just where it is today.
+
+## How to Choose the Right MFA Solution for Your Organization
+
+Selecting MFA requires matching capabilities to your specific context. Generic "best" recommendations ignore the differences between workforce authentication, customer experiences, and privileged access protection.
+
+### Match MFA to Use Cases
+
+**Workforce applications** need integration with directory services and device management. Employees authenticate frequently across multiple applications. Push notifications and passkeys reduce friction for daily access. Hardware keys make sense for roles handling sensitive data.
+
+**Customer applications** prioritize conversion over maximum security. Friction during login drives abandonment. Passkeys and magic links provide security without password fatigue. SMS OTP remains common despite weaknesses because customers already understand it.
+
+**Privileged access** demands the strongest authentication regardless of convenience. Admin consoles, production infrastructure, and financial systems justify hardware token requirements. Phishing-resistant methods (FIDO2, WebAuthn) should be mandatory, not optional.
+
+A single MFA solution rarely optimizes for all three. Many organizations deploy different authentication methods for different populations and risk levels.
+
+### Balance Security vs UX
+
+The most secure MFA provides no value if users bypass it. Adoption determines effectiveness.
+
+Start with authentication methods users will actually complete. Measure enrollment rates and authentication success rates. Identify where users abandon flows or contact support. Iterate based on data rather than security team preferences.
+
+Progressive rollout reduces resistance. Begin with voluntary enrollment, then move to required enrollment with generous timelines, then enforce authentication requirements. Users who experience MFA before mandates complain less than those forced to adopt immediately.
+
+### Integration with Current Stack
+
+MFA doesn't exist in isolation. Evaluate how solutions connect to your existing infrastructure.
+
+**Directory services**: Native integration with Azure AD, Okta, or Google Workspace simplifies provisioning. Custom LDAP configurations add deployment complexity.
+
+**Cloud platforms**: SSO integration with your SaaS applications determines how much manual configuration you'll manage. Pre-built connectors save implementation time.
+
+**Legacy systems**: Applications that only support basic authentication need solutions with protocol translation, agents, or proxy-based approaches. Not every MFA solution covers legacy edge cases.
+
+### Budget and Growth Plans
+
+Current pricing matters less than three-year total cost. Model your costs at projected user counts, not just current state.
+
+Factor in feature requirements that will emerge as you scale. Adaptive policies, compliance reporting, and API access often require premium tiers. The solution that's cheapest today might be most expensive when you need enterprise capabilities.
+
+Consider whether self-hosted options make sense at your scale. Infrastructure overhead trades against per-user licensing. The break-even point depends on your operations capacity and growth trajectory.
+
+## SuperTokens and MFA Cost: Practical Insights
+
+SuperTokens approaches MFA differently than traditional identity vendors. Understanding this perspective helps evaluate where the platform fits in your authentication strategy.
+
+### Why SuperTokens Evaluates MFA Cost
+
+Most MFA vendors obscure pricing behind sales conversations. Feature capabilities blur across marketing tiers. Organizations discover actual costs after procurement commits them to contracts.
+
+SuperTokens publishes pricing without requiring demos or negotiations. The [MFA cost breakdown](https://supertokens.com/blog/multi-factor-auth-cost) breaks down how authentication expenses accumulate across vendors and deployment scenarios. This transparency reflects a broader philosophy: developers should understand trade-offs before committing to solutions.
+
+The analysis isn't just about promoting SuperTokens. It provides frameworks for evaluating any MFA solution against real-world cost drivers: user volume thresholds, feature tier escalation, hidden operational expenses.
+
+### How Costs Accumulate in Real Deployments
+
+MFA costs compound in ways that initial pricing doesn't reveal.
+
+**User volume scaling**: A startup paying $0 at 1,000 users might face $50,000 annually at 50,000 users. Growth that should be celebrated becomes a budget problem. Solutions with flat or predictable per-user rates prevent these surprises.
+
+**Feature complexity creep**: Basic TOTP works initially. Then you need adaptive policies for compliance. Then SSO integration for enterprise customers. Then audit logging for SOC 2. Each capability addition triggers tier upgrades.
+
+**Operational overhead**: Self-hosted solutions trade licensing costs for infrastructure management. Managed services trade operational burden for per-user fees. Neither is universally better. The right choice depends on your team's capacity and cost structure.
+
+**Multi-product sprawl**: Organizations often accumulate multiple authentication solutions across different products and acquisitions. Consolidation promises savings but requires migration investment.
+
+### How SuperTokens Fits into MFA Strategy
+
+SuperTokens provides an authentication framework rather than a standalone MFA product. The distinction matters for how you evaluate it.
+
+**Session management and MFA together**: Authentication doesn't end at login. SuperTokens handles session tokens, refresh flows, and revocation alongside MFA. This integration prevents the gaps that occur when bolting separate solutions together.
+
+**Composable recipes**: TOTP, email/SMS OTP, and passwordless flows combine based on your requirements. Add WebAuthn when ready. Implement step-up authentication for sensitive operations. The architecture supports evolution without platform replacement.
+
+**Deployment flexibility**: Self-host on your infrastructure with no per-user fees, or use managed service starting free up to 5,000 MAUs. The choice depends on operational preferences, not vendor lock-in.
+
+**Trade-offs to consider**: SuperTokens requires development integration. Organizations wanting turnkey admin consoles and pre-built SaaS connectors may find enterprise identity platforms more appropriate. The flexibility that developers value can be overhead for teams without engineering resources dedicated to authentication.
+
+SuperTokens fits organizations building products where authentication is a core capability rather than a checkbox. If you need MFA that adapts to your architecture, the framework approach provides that control. If you need MFA deployed by Friday with minimal engineering involvement, other solutions may be more practical.
+
+## Summary and Recommendations
+
+The "best" MFA solution depends on your organization's specific constraints. Security strength, user experience, cost structure, and integration compatibility all factor into the decision. Optimizing for one dimension often means compromising another.
+
+### What Makes an MFA Solution "Best"
+
+**Security**: Phishing-resistant methods (FIDO2, WebAuthn, passkeys) provide stronger protection than TOTP or SMS. Adaptive policies apply appropriate scrutiny based on risk context. Hardware tokens satisfy high-assurance requirements that software solutions cannot meet.
+
+**User experience**: Authentication that users bypass provides no security value. Passkeys and push notifications reduce friction. Fallback mechanisms prevent lockouts. Progressive rollout increases adoption rates.
+
+**Cost**: Per-user licensing, feature tier escalation, and operational overhead all contribute to total cost. Model expenses at projected scale, not just current state. Self-hosted options trade licensing fees for infrastructure management.
+
+**Compatibility**: Directory integration, SaaS connectors, and legacy system support determine deployment complexity. Solutions covering your existing stack reduce implementation effort.
+
+### Recommendations by Organization Type
+
+**SMBs and startups**: Prioritize solutions with transparent pricing that scales predictably. SuperTokens' free tier and per-MAU pricing prevents budget surprises during growth. Passkey support future-proofs against password vulnerabilities without enterprise complexity.
+
+**Mid-market enterprises**: Balance feature requirements against cost. Okta and Microsoft Entra ID provide comprehensive capabilities but require careful tier selection. Evaluate whether bundled identity features justify premium pricing or whether focused MFA solutions suffice.
+
+**Large enterprises**: Integration breadth and adaptive policies justify enterprise platform investment. Ping Identity serves complex hybrid environments. Consolidation across business units often delivers savings despite higher per-user rates.
+
+**Regulated industries**: Compliance requirements constrain choices. RSA SecurID and hardware tokens satisfy FIPS validation mandates. Silverfort extends MFA to legacy systems that auditors flag. Documentation and audit logging capabilities matter as much as authentication strength.
+
+**Development teams building products**: SuperTokens provides authentication infrastructure that adapts to your architecture. The recipe system supports MFA evolution without platform migration. Self-hosting eliminates per-user costs for high-volume applications.
+
+### Making the Decision
+
+Start with your constraints: compliance requirements, existing infrastructure, user population characteristics, and budget boundaries. These narrow the field before feature comparison begins.
+
+Model costs realistically. SuperTokens' [MFA cost breakdown](https://supertokens.com/blog/multi-factor-auth-cost) provides frameworks for projecting expenses across growth scenarios. The cheapest solution today may be the most expensive choice at scale.
+
+Pilot before committing. Deploy to a subset of users, measure adoption and support burden, then expand based on actual experience rather than vendor promises.
+
+MFA is foundational infrastructure. The solution you choose will persist for years. Invest evaluation effort proportional to that timeline.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/static/blog-seo/config.json b/static/blog-seo/config.json
index b38e38f5..2423a30c 100644
--- a/static/blog-seo/config.json
+++ b/static/blog-seo/config.json
@@ -3322,10 +3322,9 @@
         ],
         "title": "Stytch vs Auth0 (2025): Pricing, Features, and More",
         "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/stytch-vs-auth0\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Discover how Stytch and Auth0 compare in pricing, features, developer experience, and fraud tools — plus explore an open-source, self-hosted alternative offering full control and transparency for modern authentication.\",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/stytch-vs-auth0.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
-
     },
     {
-      "path": "/blog/auth0-vs-fusionauth",
+        "path": "/blog/auth0-vs-fusionauth",
         "metaTags": [
             "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Auth0 vs FusionAuth in 2025: pricing, hosting (SaaS vs self-host), DX, and best-fit use cases—plus an open-source alternative to consider.\" />",
             "",
@@ -3348,7 +3347,7 @@
         "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/auth0-vs-fusionauth\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Auth0 vs FusionAuth in 2025: pricing, hosting (SaaS vs self-host), DX, and best-fit use cases—plus an open-source alternative to consider.\",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/auth0-vs-fusionauth.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
     },
     {
-      "path": "/blog/workos-alternatives",
+        "path": "/blog/workos-alternatives",
         "metaTags": [
             "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Discover the best WorkOS alternatives for SSO, SCIM, and audit logs — open-source and managed options, pricing signals, and when SuperTokens fits.\" />",
             "",
@@ -3393,7 +3392,7 @@
         "title": "SolidJS Authentication: What Framework Should You Use?",
         "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/solidjs-auth\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Learn how to add secure authentication to SolidJS apps. Compare authentication frameworks and see why SuperTokens is a SolidJS-ready solution.\",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/solidjs-auth.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
     },
-    {    
+    {
         "path": "/blog/biometric-auth",
         "metaTags": [
             "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Understand biometric authentication on the web: how it works, use cases, security benefits, and how to implement it using WebAuthn.\" />",
@@ -4680,5 +4679,51 @@
         ],
         "title": "Prompt Injection Attacks on LLMs: The Hidden AI Phishing Threat",
         "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/gemini-phishing-attack\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Prompt injection attacks can trick LLMs into phishing users. Learn how invisible HTML is being weaponized—and how to protect your app’s auth flows.\",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/gemini-phishing-attacks.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
+    },
+    {
+        "path": "/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025",
+        "metaTags": [
+            "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\" />",
+            "",
+            "<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"Authentication, Open Source, Authorization, User Management, OAuth, Enterprise SSO, Security\" />",
+            "<!--OG Tags-->",
+            "<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Best MFA Solutions Compared (2025 Guide)\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\"/>",
+            "<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\" />",
+            "",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:url\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\" /> ",
+            "<!--OG Tags-->",
+            "<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\">"
+        ],
+        "title": "Best MFA Solutions Compared (2025 Guide)",
+        "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
+    },
+    {
+        "path": "/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025",
+        "metaTags": [
+            "<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\" />",
+            "",
+            "<meta name=\"keywords\" content=\"Authentication, Open Source, Authorization, User Management, OAuth, Enterprise SSO, Security\" />",
+            "<!--OG Tags-->",
+            "<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Best MFA Solutions Compared (2025 Guide)\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\" />",
+            "<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\"/>",
+            "<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\" />",
+            "",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:url\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\" />",
+            "<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\" /> ",
+            "<!--OG Tags-->",
+            "<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\">"
+        ],
+        "title": "Best MFA Solutions Compared (2025 Guide)",
+        "schema": "<script type=\"application/ld+json\"> {\n            \"@context\": \"https://schema.org\",\n            \"@type\": \"Article\",\n            \"mainEntityOfPage\": {\n                \"@type\": \"WebPage\",\n                \"@id\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025\"\n            },\n            \"headline\": \"Compare the best MFA solutions in 2025: features, costs, and trade-offs. Includes insights from SuperTokens’ MFA cost guide.\",\n            \"image\": \"https://supertokens.com/blog-meta-images/TODO.png\",\n            \"author\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com\"\n            },\n            \"publisher\": {\n                \"@type\": \"Organization\",\n                \"name\": \"SuperTokens\",\n                \"logo\": {\n                    \"@type\": \"ImageObject\",\n                    \"url\": \"https://supertokens.com/static/assets/dark-home/logo.png\"\n                }\n            }\n        }</script>"
     }
 ]
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json b/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json
index bf847c7a..64514332 100644
--- a/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json
+++ b/static/blog-seo/sitemapconfig.json
@@ -312,18 +312,18 @@
         "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/stytch-vs-auth0"
     },
     {
-      "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/auth0-vs-fusionauth"
+        "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/auth0-vs-fusionauth"
     },
     {
         "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/workos-alternatives"
     },
-    {    
+    {
         "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/biometric-auth"
     },
     {
-      "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/solidjs-auth"
+        "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/solidjs-auth"
     },
-    {    
+    {
         "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/biometric-auth"
     },
     {
@@ -496,5 +496,11 @@
     },
     {
         "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/gemini-phishing-attack"
+    },
+    {
+        "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025"
+    },
+    {
+        "location": "https://supertokens.com/blog/best-mfa-solutions-2025"
     }
 ]
\ No newline at end of file