Annotation of "y compris"

[bguil]

The annotation of "y compris" is inconsistent in French treebanks:

• in GSD and in Rhapsodie: PRON + VERB and ExtPos=ADP
• in Sequoia: PRON + ADJ with various ExtPos
• in FQB: PRON + VERB and ExtPos=CCONJ
• in ParTUT: PRON + VERB

I propose to make all annotations following GSD and Rhapsodie.

[bguil]

PRON + VERB and ExtPos=CCONJ (car y compris à Paris)

[simeng-song]

The token “compris” has already been annotated as upos=VERB, ExtPos=CCONJ, and lemma="comprendre" in the French treebanks.

As for its syntactic dependencies, a comp:obl relation is currently annotated between “y” and “compris” in the GSD. Since “compris” is now treated as a CCONJ, should we add a cc dependency pointing to it, as well as a conj:coord between the coordinated elements before and after “y compris”?

[sylvainkahane]

Yes cc and conj:cordEnvoyé de mon smartphoneLe 20 juin 2025 à 16:59, simeng-song ***@***.***> a écrit :simeng-song left a comment (surfacesyntacticud/guidelines#51) The token “compris” has already been annotated as upos=VERB, ExtPos=CCONJ, and lemma="comprendre" in the French treebanks. As for its syntactic dependencies, a comp:obl relation is currently annotated between “y” and “compris” in the GSD. Since “compris” is now treated as a CCONJ, should we add a cc dependency pointing to it, as well as a conj:coord between the coordinated elements before and after “y compris”? —Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: ***@***.***>