|
| 1 | +# EP-XXX: [Enhancement Title] |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Status**: Draft |
| 4 | +**Author**: [Your Name] |
| 5 | +**Created**: YYYY-MM-DD |
| 6 | +**Last Updated**: YYYY-MM-DD |
| 7 | + |
| 8 | +## Summary |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +[Provide a concise, one-paragraph summary of the proposed enhancement. Explain what it is and why it's needed. This should be understandable by a general audience.] |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +## Problem Statement |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +[Describe the problem this enhancement aims to solve. What are the pain points or limitations in the current system? Why is this change necessary?] |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +### Current Limitations |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +[List the specific limitations of the current implementation that this proposal addresses.] |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +1. Limitation 1... |
| 21 | +2. Limitation 2... |
| 22 | +3. ... |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +## Goals |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +[List the primary objectives of this proposal. What should be achieved by implementing this enhancement?] |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +- **Primary Goal**: ... |
| 29 | +- **Secondary Goal**: ... |
| 30 | +- ... |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +## Non-Goals |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +[List what is explicitly out of scope for this proposal. This helps to focus the discussion and set clear boundaries.] |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +- ... |
| 37 | +- ... |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +## Requirements |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +### Functional Requirements |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | +[List the specific functional requirements. These should be testable and describe what the system must do.] |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +- Requirement 1... |
| 46 | +- Requirement 2... |
| 47 | +- ... |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### Non-Functional Requirements |
| 50 | + |
| 51 | +[List the non-functional requirements, such as performance, reliability, security, maintainability, and testability.] |
| 52 | + |
| 53 | +- **Performance**: ... |
| 54 | +- **Reliability**: ... |
| 55 | +- **Security**: ... |
| 56 | +- **Maintainability**: ... |
| 57 | +- **Testability**: ... |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | +## Proposed Solution |
| 60 | + |
| 61 | +### High-Level Architecture |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +[Provide a high-level overview of the proposed solution. Use diagrams, text, or both to illustrate the new architecture and how it fits into the existing system.] |
| 64 | + |
| 65 | +```text |
| 66 | +[ASCII diagram or high-level description] |
| 67 | +``` |
| 68 | + |
| 69 | +### Key Design Choices |
| 70 | + |
| 71 | +[Explain any significant design decisions made in the proposed solution. For example, choice of libraries, algorithms, or patterns.] |
| 72 | + |
| 73 | +## Detailed Design |
| 74 | + |
| 75 | +### Package Structure |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +[Show the proposed changes to the project's directory and package structure.] |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +```text |
| 80 | +internal/ |
| 81 | +├── new-package/ |
| 82 | +│ ├── component.go |
| 83 | +│ └── component_test.go |
| 84 | +└── existing-package/ |
| 85 | + └── modified_file.go |
| 86 | +``` |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +### API/Interface Changes |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +[Describe any changes to public APIs, service interfaces, or data structures. Show code snippets for new or modified interfaces.] |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +## Configuration |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +[Describe how the new feature will be configured. Include details on new configuration files, CLI flags, and environment variables.] |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +### Main Configuration Changes |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +[Show the proposed changes to the main configuration file (e.g., `config.go` or `config.yaml`).] |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +```go |
| 101 | +// Example config struct change |
| 102 | +type NewFeatureConfig struct { |
| 103 | + Enabled *bool `yaml:"enabled"` |
| 104 | + SomeValue string `yaml:"someValue"` |
| 105 | +} |
| 106 | +``` |
| 107 | + |
| 108 | +### New Configuration File (if applicable) |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +[If a new configuration file is needed, describe its format and provide an example.] |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +```yaml |
| 113 | +# Example: /etc/kepler/new-feature.yaml |
| 114 | +feature: |
| 115 | + key: value |
| 116 | +``` |
| 117 | +
|
| 118 | +### Security Considerations |
| 119 | +
|
| 120 | +[Detail the security implications of this enhancement. How are secrets managed? What are the authentication/authorization requirements?] |
| 121 | +
|
| 122 | +## Deployment Examples |
| 123 | +
|
| 124 | +[Provide examples of how to deploy and use this feature in different environments (e.g., Kubernetes, standalone).] |
| 125 | +
|
| 126 | +### Kubernetes Environment |
| 127 | +
|
| 128 | +[Show a sample Kubernetes manifest (e.g., DaemonSet, Deployment) with the new configuration.] |
| 129 | +
|
| 130 | +### Standalone Deployment |
| 131 | +
|
| 132 | +[Provide command-line examples for running the application with the new feature enabled.] |
| 133 | +
|
| 134 | +## Testing Strategy |
| 135 | +
|
| 136 | +### Test Coverage |
| 137 | +
|
| 138 | +[Describe the testing plan. What types of tests will be added (unit, integration, end-to-end)? What is the target code coverage?] |
| 139 | +
|
| 140 | +- **Unit Tests**: ... |
| 141 | +- **Integration Tests**: ... |
| 142 | +- **End-to-End Tests**: ... |
| 143 | +
|
| 144 | +### Test Infrastructure |
| 145 | +
|
| 146 | +[Describe any new infrastructure or tools required for testing (e.g., simulators, mock servers).] |
| 147 | +
|
| 148 | +## Migration and Compatibility |
| 149 | +
|
| 150 | +### Backward Compatibility |
| 151 | +
|
| 152 | +[Explain how this change affects backward compatibility. Are there any breaking changes? How will they be managed?] |
| 153 | +
|
| 154 | +### Migration Path |
| 155 | +
|
| 156 | +[Provide a step-by-step guide for users to migrate from the old system to the new one.] |
| 157 | +
|
| 158 | +1. **Phase 1**: ... |
| 159 | +2. **Phase 2**: ... |
| 160 | +3. ... |
| 161 | +
|
| 162 | +### Rollback Strategy |
| 163 | +
|
| 164 | +[Describe the process for rolling back the change if issues are discovered after deployment.] |
| 165 | +
|
| 166 | +## Metrics Output |
| 167 | +
|
| 168 | +[List any new or modified Prometheus metrics that will be exposed by this feature.] |
| 169 | +
|
| 170 | +```prometheus |
| 171 | +# Description of new metric |
| 172 | +new_metric_name{label="value"} 123 |
| 173 | +``` |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +## Implementation Plan |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +[Break down the implementation into a series of phases or milestones.] |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +### Phase 1: Foundation |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +- Task 1... |
| 182 | +- Task 2... |
| 183 | + |
| 184 | +### Phase 2: Core Functionality |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +- Task 1... |
| 187 | +- Task 2... |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +### Phase 3: Testing and Documentation |
| 190 | + |
| 191 | +- Task 1... |
| 192 | +- Task 2... |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +## Risks and Mitigations |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +[Identify potential risks (technical, operational) and propose mitigation strategies for each.] |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +### Technical Risks |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +- **Risk**: ... |
| 201 | + - **Mitigation**: ... |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +### Operational Risks |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +- **Risk**: ... |
| 206 | + - **Mitigation**: ... |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +## Alternatives Considered |
| 209 | + |
| 210 | +[Describe any alternative solutions that were considered and explain why they were rejected.] |
| 211 | + |
| 212 | +### Alternative 1: [Name of Alternative] |
| 213 | + |
| 214 | +- **Description**: ... |
| 215 | +- **Reason for Rejection**: ... |
| 216 | + |
| 217 | +### Alternative 2: [Name of Alternative] |
| 218 | + |
| 219 | +- **Description**: ... |
| 220 | +- **Reason for Rejection**: ... |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +## Success Metrics |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +[Define the metrics that will be used to measure the success of this enhancement.] |
| 225 | + |
| 226 | +- **Functional Metric**: ... |
| 227 | +- **Performance Metric**: ... |
| 228 | +- **Adoption Metric**: ... |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | +## Open Questions |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +[List any open questions or unresolved issues that need to be addressed during implementation.] |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | +1. ... |
| 235 | +2. ... |
0 commit comments