|
| 1 | +# HTML Coverage Report |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +* Proposal: [SE-NNNN](NNNN-swiftpm-html-coverage-report.md) |
| 4 | +* Authors: [Sam Khouri](https://github.com/bkhouri) |
| 5 | +* Review Manager: TBD |
| 6 | +* Status: **Awaiting implementation** |
| 7 | +* Implementation: [swiftlang/swift-package-manager#9076][PR] |
| 8 | +* Decision Notes: [Pitch](https://forums.swift.org/t/pitch-adding-html-coverage-support/82358) |
| 9 | + |
| 10 | +## Introduction |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Currently, `swift test` supports generating a JSON coverage report, which is |
| 13 | +great for ingesting into various systems. The JSON, however, is not very |
| 14 | +"human-readable" while iterating at-desk. |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +This proposes adding an additional command line argument to `swift test` that |
| 17 | +would allow the caller to select the generation of an HTML coverage report. |
| 18 | + |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +## Motivation |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +JSON coverage report is great for ingesting into external tools that post-process |
| 23 | +the coverage data. If SwiftPM could generate an HTML coverage report: |
| 24 | + - said report can be uploaded to CI systems for visual inspection |
| 25 | + - developer can generate the report at-desk, giving faster feedback to determine |
| 26 | + if the current changes are sufficiently covered to their liking. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +## Proposed solution |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +If users currently want an HTML report, the user must manually construct the |
| 33 | +`llvm-cov` binary directly with the correct command line arguments. |
| 34 | + |
| 35 | +e.g.: |
| 36 | +```sh |
| 37 | +❯ swift test --enable-code-coverage |
| 38 | + |
| 39 | +❯ swift test --show-codecov-path |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +❯ llvm-cov show \ |
| 42 | + --project-title="HelloWorld" \ |
| 43 | + --format="html" \ |
| 44 | + --output-dir=".coverage" \ |
| 45 | + --instr-profile=".build/arm64-apple-macosx/debug/codecov/default.profdata" \ |
| 46 | + ".build/.../HelloWorldPackageTests.xctest/Contents/MacOS/HelloWorldPackageTests" \ |
| 47 | + "Sources" |
| 48 | +``` |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +Since SwiftPM currently orchestrates the JSON coverage data, the solution adds a |
| 51 | +new command line argument, e.g.: `--coverage-format` to `swift test` which can |
| 52 | +be specified multiple times, to generate multiple coverage report type from a |
| 53 | +single test execution. |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +While processing the coverage data, SwiftPM will loop on all the unique coverage |
| 56 | +format options to generate the specified reports. |
| 57 | + |
| 58 | +Unless otherwise specified, this proposal applies only to the HTML Coverage |
| 59 | +report. The generation of the JSON Coverage report is unchanged and is out of |
| 60 | +scope. |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +## Detailed design |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +Existing tools in LLVM have been around for several years (and maybe even decades), |
| 65 | +and provide robust tools for code coverage analysis. The LLVM tools are |
| 66 | +well-documented, and have been used in production for many years. SwiftPM will |
| 67 | +make use of LLVM's tools and construct the proper command line arguments to the |
| 68 | +`llvm-cov show` utility, which will generate the HTML report. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | +### Format Selection |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +The `swift test` command line will have an option named `--coverage-format`, |
| 73 | +which accepts either `json` or `html`. This option can be specified multiple |
| 74 | +times on the command line, and a report will be generated for each format |
| 75 | +specified. |
| 76 | + |
| 77 | +The command line option will be similar to: |
| 78 | + |
| 79 | +```sh |
| 80 | + --codecov-format, --code-coverage-format, --coverage-format <format> |
| 81 | + Format of the code coverage output. Can be specified multiple times. (default: json) |
| 82 | + json - Produces a JSON coverage report. |
| 83 | + html - Produces an HTML report producd by llvm-cov. |
| 84 | +``` |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +### Coverage Report configuration |
| 88 | + |
| 89 | +`llvm-cov show` has several report configurability options. In order to |
| 90 | +prevent a "command line arguments" explosion to `swift test`, the configuration |
| 91 | +options will be read from a response file. The optinal response file will be |
| 92 | +located in `<repo>/.swiftpm/configuration/coverage.html.report.args.txt`. The |
| 93 | +response file will be supported. |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +The user can include `--format=text`, or a variation thereof, in the resoonse |
| 96 | +file. In order to ensure SwiftPM will always generated an HTML report, SwiftPM |
| 97 | +will add `--format=html` after the responsefile argument to ensure `llvm-cov` |
| 98 | +will generate an HTML report. |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | + |
| 102 | +SwiftPM will not perform any validation on the response file contents, except |
| 103 | +to determine the output location. |
| 104 | + |
| 105 | +### Coverage report location |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +By default, the HTML report will be created in location under the scratch path |
| 108 | +(ie: the build directory). However, this can be overriden using the response file. |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | +Some CI system, such as [Jenkins](https://www.jenkins.io), only allow archiving |
| 111 | +contents required files/directories that belong in a "sandbox" location. It |
| 112 | +can be a safe assumption that the CI system will have a copy of the repository |
| 113 | +in the "sandbox" location, allow this system to upload the HTML report. |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | + |
| 116 | +### Show coverage path |
| 117 | +Prior to this proposal `swift test --show-coverage-path` would display a single |
| 118 | +absolute path location to the JSON coverage report. |
| 119 | + |
| 120 | +Since `--coverage-format` can be specified multiple times, it's output must be |
| 121 | +changed to reflect the new functionality. |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | +If the `--coverage-format` option is specified on the `swift test` command line |
| 124 | +a single time (or is not specified at all), there is no change to the output. |
| 125 | + |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +if `--coverage-format` is specified multiple times, the output must reflect this. |
| 128 | +A new command line argument `--print-coverage-path-mode` option will be available |
| 129 | +to describe the visual representation of the output paths. The options accepts |
| 130 | +`json`json` or `text` and applies whenever `--show-coverage-path` is selected. |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +A value of `json` will output a JSON object with the key representing the format, |
| 133 | +and the value representing the output location of said format. |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +A value of `text` will omit the format in the output if a single `coverage-format` |
| 136 | +is requested. Otherwise, the output will be similar to |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +```sh |
| 139 | +❯ swift test -c release --build-system swiftbuild --show-coverage-path --coverage-format html --coverage-format json |
| 140 | +Building for debugging... |
| 141 | +[5/5] Write swift-version-4B9677C1F510A69F.txt |
| 142 | +Build complete! (0.37s) |
| 143 | +Html: /swift-package-manager/.build/arm64-apple-macosx/Products/Release/codecov/Simple-html |
| 144 | +Json: /swift-package-manager/.build/arm64-apple-macosx/Products/Release/codecov/Simple.json |
| 145 | +``` |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +So user can programatically, and reliably, retrieve the coverage report location, |
| 148 | +an additional command line argument is made available. |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +```sh |
| 151 | + --print-codecov-path-mode, --print-code-coverage-path-mode, --print-coverage-path-mode <print-codecov-path-mode> |
| 152 | + How to display the paths of the selected code coverage file formats. (default: text) |
| 153 | + json - Display the output in JSON format. |
| 154 | + text - Display the output as plain text. |
| 155 | +``` |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +```sh |
| 158 | +❯ swift test -c release --build-system swiftbuild --show-coverage-path --coverage-format html --coverage-format json --print-coverage-path-mode json |
| 159 | +Building for debugging... |
| 160 | +[1/1] Write swift-version-4B9677C1F510A69F.txt |
| 161 | +Build of product 'swift-test' complete! (0.40s) |
| 162 | +{ |
| 163 | + "html" : "/Users/bkhouri/Documents/git/public/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/.build/arm64-apple-macosx/Products/Release/codecov/SwiftPM-html", |
| 164 | + "json" : "/Users/bkhouri/Documents/git/public/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/.build/arm64-apple-macosx/Products/Release/codecov/SwiftPM.json" |
| 165 | +} |
| 166 | +``` |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +## Security |
| 169 | + |
| 170 | +Since SwiftPM will use `llvm-cov show`, there may be security implications from |
| 171 | +the `llvm-cov` utility, but this is outside of the Swift organizations control. |
| 172 | + |
| 173 | +The LLVM project has a [LLVM Security Response Group](https://llvm.org/docs/Security.html), |
| 174 | +which has a process for handling security vulnerabilities. |
| 175 | + |
| 176 | +## Impact on existing packages |
| 177 | + |
| 178 | +No impact is expected. |
| 179 | + |
| 180 | +## Alternatives considered |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +- In addition to the response file, the coverage report generation can support |
| 183 | + a command line argument similar to `-Xlinker`, `-Xcc` and others, which will |
| 184 | + pass the arguments to `llvm-cov show` and override the values in the response |
| 185 | + file. This has _not_ be implemented in the [PR]. |
| 186 | + |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +[PR]: https://github.com/swiftlang/swift-package-manager/pull/9076 |
0 commit comments